judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

NESMITH VS. NESMITH

Case Information: 37108
Short Caption:NESMITH VS. NESMITHCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D96786Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:03/19/2001How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/05/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
12/05/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-21223
12/05/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
12/18/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Douglas L. Nesmith (Emily Stevens Services--check no. 2250).
02/13/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 01-02871
03/19/2001Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Mailed on: 03/15/01. 01-04801
03/19/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
05/16/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a response, including points and authorities, showing why the district court's order should not be reversed and remanded on the grounds specified above. fn1[We remind appellant that he has not been granted leave to file papers in proper person in this matter. See NRAP 46(b). 02-08662
07/08/2002MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 02-11566
07/19/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On July 8, 2002, respondent filed an untimely motion requesting an additional 30 days, until July 17, 2002, to file her response. The requested extensions has expired and this court has not received respondent's response. The July 8, 2002, motion is denied as moot. Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial efficiency respondent shall have 7 days from the dte of this order to file and serve her response. 02-12449
07/31/2002MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 02-13162
10/28/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to Clark County Clerk regarding Transmission of Video Tape.
11/04/2002Other Other. Received Video Tape from Shelly A. Ajoub of proceeding held October 31, 2000. 02-19015
04/04/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Directing Supplemental Response. Supplemental response due from respondent: 30 days from the date of this order. 03-05653
05/08/2003MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Respondent's Supplemental Response. 03-07851
06/20/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Remand. Order of Reversal and Remand. "We reverse the order directing appellant to pay arrears in the amount of $13,724.56, and remand this matter to the district court for recalculation of the arrearages amount, which shall not include any amount for periods in which support was abated, according to the referee's recommendation and the parties' conduct. . . . We also reverse the district court's $1,000 fee award. Upon remand, the district court may reconsider whether and to what extent fees are warranted." fn5-[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] NNP03-RR/WM/MG 03-10328
07/15/2003RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. 03-10409
07/15/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
07/31/2003RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 17, 2003. 03-10409
06/23/2004RemittiturIssued Return Letter. Returned Exhibit: Video Tape from Shelly A. Ajoub of proceeding held October 31, 2000. 03-10409
07/30/2004RemittiturFiled Letter: Entered Receipt for Documents. Received by County Clerk on June 25, 2004. 03-10409