Docket Entries |
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
11/24/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Mortimer Sourwine & Sloane, Ltd.--check no. 6502. | | |
11/24/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | | 99-11751 |
12/01/1999 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Ann Morgan. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
12/06/1999 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Settlement Judge Reassignment. New Settlement Judge: Thomas W. Gruesen, Sr. | | |
12/06/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. | | 99-12233 |
12/21/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Appellant's Fullerton and Bennett's Response/Objection to Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. | | 99-13006 |
01/21/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On December 6, 1999, attorney Paul A. Matteoni filed a notice of withdrawal as counsel for respondent Thread Technology, Inc. On December 21, 1999, appellants filed an objection. The district court notice did not, however, operate to substitute Thread Technology, Inc. and John T. Schell, III, as attorney of record for Thread Technology in this appeal. Respondent Thread Technology, Inc., shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, retain new counsel to represent it in this appeal and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with the clerk of this court. New counsel will be expected to participate in the settlement proceedings. | | 00-00982 |
01/31/2000 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: February 17, 2000. | | 00-01540 |
02/24/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Appearance. Representing respondent Thread Technology: Jeffrey A. Dickerson. | | 00-02943 |
03/06/2000 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 00-03514 |
03/07/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to File Docketing Statement. Due Date: 15 days | | |
03/10/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. | | 00-03810 |
03/14/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Respondent's Opposition to Dismiss Appeal. | | 00-04019 |
03/22/2000 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 00-04600 |
04/06/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Nevertheless, the briefing and request for transcripts shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review and further order of this court. fn1[We defer ruling on appellants' motion filed on March 10, 2000, pending completion of our preliminary jurisdictional review.] | | 00-05539 |
05/17/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Change of Firm Address for Law Office of Jeffrey A. Dickerson. | | 00-08279 |
12/29/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Briefing Reinstated. On March 10, 2000, appellants filed a motion to dismiss their appeal, which respondents have opposed. We conclude that this appeal should proceed, and we defer ruling on appellants' motion to dismiss their appeal until the completion of briefing. fn1[Appellants may move for voluntary dismissal of their appeal pursuant to NRAP 42(b).] Appellants: 15 days to comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 00-22726 |
01/05/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | | 01-00304 |
04/20/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion and Order/Excess Pages. Granted: 40 pages. | | 01-06800 |
04/26/2001 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 04/26/01 (Reno/Carson). | | 01-07074 |
04/26/2001 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. Vols. 1 through 6. | | 01-07075 |
05/25/2001 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 05/25/01. | | 01-08834 |
05/29/2001 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Answering Brief of Respondent Thread Technology, Inc. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Messenger 5/29/01. | | 01-08947 |
05/31/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Certificate of Compliance. | | 01-09131 |
06/22/2001 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: July 13, 2001. | | 01-10625 |
07/12/2001 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 07/12/01 (Reno/Carson). | | 01-11853 |
07/17/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On May 31, 2001, Mr. Dickerson filed a certificate of compliance. That certificate does not meet the requirements of NRAP 28A(b). Mr. Dickerson shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file a proper certificate of compliance. | | 01-12121 |
07/24/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Certificate of Compliance. for Appellant's Reply Brief. | | 01-12571 |
07/30/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Order Allowing Substitution of Appendix to Include Thread Technology Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Final Determination re: Patent License. | | 01-12849 |
08/09/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Appellants filed a Motion to Dismiss their appeal on jurisdictional grounds. Respondents have filed an opposition. We deny the motion to dismiss appellant's appeal. Fn1[Based on the notice of appeal, this court assumes First Phoenix is still an appellant in this matter. The parties shall notify this court within 10 days if First Phoenix is no longer an appellant.] | | 01-13499 |
08/14/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed July 30, 2001. The clerk of this court shall file the supplement to the appendix that is attached to the motion. | | 01-13860 |
08/14/2001 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Supplement to Appendix. | | 01-13867 |
08/16/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Status Report. Statement by Appellant's Counsel Regarding Status of First Phoenix Inc., in this Appeal. | | 01-13975 |
08/29/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. fn1[Pursuant to our inquiry, appellants have notified this court that First Phoenix is no longer a party in this case because the complaint as to First Phoenix was dismissed on November 15, 1991. But on November 19, 1991, an amended complaint was filed, naming First Phoenix as a defendant. Consequently, this court is not persuaded that First Phoenix should be removed from the court's docket as an appellant.] Response due from appellants: 30 days from the date of this order. We caution appellants that this appeal may be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction if appellants fail to demonstrate that jurisdiction is proper within 30 days of the date of this order. | | 01-14598 |
09/18/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Change of Address. Attorney Jeffrey Dickerson. | | 01-15787 |
09/19/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | | 01-15852 |
11/27/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Stipulation & Order entered 9/6/01. Due Date: 10 days | | |
11/30/2001 | Order/Incoming | Filed District Court Order. Certified copy of Stipulation and Order Dismissing Second Claim for Relief of Amended Complaint and Confirming Dismissal of First Phoenix filed in district court on September 6, 2001. | | 01-20072 |
12/19/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Allowing Appeal to Proceed. fn1[on September 6, 2001, the district court confirmed its November 1991 consent order dismissing First Phoenix as a defendant. We direct the clerk of this court to delete First Phoenix from the caption on this court's docket.] In response to our show cause order, the parties obtained from the district court a stipulated order filed September 6, 2001, dismissing with prejudice the second claim for relief. Appellants then filed an amended notice of appeal. We construe appellants' statement in the amended notice of appeal, that the September 6, 2001 order rendered the October 8, 1999 order final and appealable, to indicate an intent to appeal from both orders. Thus, appellants' amended notice of appeal properly confers jurisdiction on this court. We shall allow this appeal to proceed. | | 01-21374 |
12/28/2001 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Agosti. Sat in related district court proceedings. | | |
04/08/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on June 27, 2002, at 11:00 a.m. (En Banc) | | |
06/12/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | | |
06/27/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Before the En Banc Court. EN BANC | | |
07/12/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion. Request for Supplementation of the Record. | | 02-12000 |
07/31/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On July 12, 2002, respondent Thread Technology, Inc. filed a motion entitled, "Request for Supplementation of the Record." attached to the motion is a copy of an unpublished decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia decided on December 9, 1999. Appellants have not opposed the motion. This court will consider the decision attached to the motion in or disposition of this appeal. | | 02-13135 |
10/18/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To assist this court in properly resolving this appeal, we have determined that the appellate court record should be supplemented with the indictment and amended indictment filed in the criminal proceedings against appellants. Accordingly, the clerk of the district court shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, certify and transmit to this court the indictment filed on November 18, 1992, and the amended indictment filed on January 20, 1998, in the case of State v. Fullerton, Second Judicial District Court Case No. CR-92-2166. | | 02-18176 |
10/18/2002 | Other | Other. Received (via fax) copy of indictment filed on November 18, 1992, and the amended indictment filed on January 20, 1998, in the case of State v. Fullerton, Second Judicial District Court Case No. CR-92-2166. | | 02-18183 |
10/29/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "We reverse those portions of the district court's order granting summary judgment on the Brinkley and Colvin claims and awarding $20,000.00 plus interest on McVickers' claim for goods and services and $1,907.28 plus interest on the Hackbarths' claim for goods and services. We affirm the district court's orders in all other respects and remand this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.' fn28[We have considered appellants' remaining claims of error and find them to be without merit.] En Banc-WM/CY/MS/RR/ML/NB | | 02-18633 |
11/26/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 02-18885 |
11/26/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
12/20/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 2, 2002. | | 02-18885 |