judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MOSLEY VS. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

Case Information: 36775
Short Caption:MOSLEY VS. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):NONEClassification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Cert/Man/Pro
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:02/08/2001 at 1:30 PMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:02/08/2001How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/20/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Galatz Earl & Associates--check no. 10385.
09/20/2000Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ. 00-16592
09/20/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Petitioner's Appendix, Volumes 1 through 3. 00-16593
10/03/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due from respondent: 30 days from the date of this order. 00-17546
11/02/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-19297
11/06/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We grant respondent's motion for an extension of time, to and including November 13, 2000, to file and serve an answer to the petition for a werit of certiorari, mandamus or prohibition filed in this matter. 00-19471
11/14/2000Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer to Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Mandamus, or Prohibition. 00-19942
11/14/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. to Answer to Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Mandamus, or Prohibition, Vols. I And II. 00-19943
11/15/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Amended Affidavit of Mailing - Clerk of the Supreme Court. 00-20068
11/28/2000MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to file Brief as Amicus Curiae. 00-20803
12/01/2000MotionFiled Motion. Joinder of the Honorable Nancy M. Saitta in "Motion to file Brief as Amicus Curiae" and in Proposed "Brief of Amicus Curiae." 00-20956
12/04/2000MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Oral Argument. 00-21126
12/11/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae. 00-21596
12/12/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Response to Motion for Oral Argument. 00-21726
12/13/2000MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae. 00-21837
12/20/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on February 8, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. (En Banc)
12/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. On December 4, 2000, petitioner filed a "Motion for Oral Argument." On December 12, 2000, respondent filed a response to the motion stating it has no objection to oral argument being held in this matter. Cause appearing, we grant petitioner's motion. The clerk of the court shall schedule this matter for oral argument before the en banc court in February, 2001. 00-22214
12/26/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for leave to file Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae. Mailed on: 12/22/00. 00-22426
01/08/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Order Granting motion for leave to file Brief as Amicus Curiae. Several judges of the Eighth Judicial District Court have filed a motion for leave to file an amicus brief in this matter, and have submitted a proposed brief. Pursuant to NRAP 29, it appears that a motion was not necessary. Respondent file an opposition to the motion. Despite the fast that no motion was required, in the interest of judicial efficiency, we grant the motion and direct the clerk of this court to file the brief received on November 28, 2000. fn1[We deny the amici's motion for leave to file a reply in support of their motion for leave to file an amicus brief as moot in light of this order, and direct the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the proposed reply received on December 13, 2000.] 01-00327
01/08/2001BriefFiled Amicus Brief. Brief of Amicus Curiae. 00-20804
01/08/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Bill Curran: returned unfiled, the original Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, received December 13, 2000.
01/22/2001BriefFiled Joinder to Brief. Joinder and Brief of Amici Curiae. 01-01413
01/24/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
01/31/2001Other Other. Filed S.C.R. 230 Media Request to Broadcast, Televise, Record and Take Photographs in the Courtroom. 01-02082
02/05/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. A request having been made seeking access to the Supreme Court of Nevada for the purpose of photographic or electronic coverage of the hearing to be held Thursday,February 8, 2001, at 1:30 p.m.; permission is granted for photographic or electronic media coverage of the aforesaid matter, for news purposes. All persons participating in such photographic or electronic coverage shall observe the standards set forth in the Supreme Court Rules in all respects, and Jo Ann Hanéman of Sunbelt Communications Company is designated as pool coordinator for purposes of organizing and coordinating the orderly coverage of such proceedings by all participants. All equipment necessary to allow for such photographic or electronic coverage of such proceedings shall be placed in the courtroom at 1:00 p.m., and before commencement of the hearing in the aforesaid matter. 01-02351
02/08/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. EN BNAC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML/NB
02/15/2001Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney Richard Segerblom regarding status of District Judge Mark M. Denton as a recently designated member of the Judicial Discipline Commission. 01-03024
03/12/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Richard Segerblom in response to his letter of 2/15/01. Upon receipt of a notice of withdrawal, Judge Denton's name will be removed as amicus curiae. 01-04360
05/17/2001Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. Petition granted in part and denied in part. The record in this matter demonstrates that the Commission's combination of functions did not deprive Judge Mosley of his due process rights under the Federal and Nevada State Constitutions. We decline to order the Commission to terminate its proceedings. fn40[We note that the United States District Court for the District of Nevada has stayed its consideration of Judge Mosley's claim for federal relief pending interlocutory review of the Commission's denial of Judge Mosley's motion to dismiss.] Because the appointment of the alternate commissioners if infirm, ' . . . we direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus.' Before the Court En Banc. By the Court, Maupin, C.J. We concur: Young, Rose and Becker, JJ. Shearing, J., with whom Agosti, J., agrees, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Leavitt, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. 117 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 34. EN BANC 01-08188
05/17/2001WritIssued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of opinion mailed to Neil G. Galatz for service upon the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline. 01-08226
06/11/2001WritFiled Writ. Served on Alan B. Rabkin, General Counsel and Executive Director of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline, on May 30, 2001. 01-08226
06/12/2001RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 01-08408
06/12/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.