| Case Information: 35173 | |||
| Short Caption: | JENKINS (ROGER) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 42915 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C143015 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 03/20/2000 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/23/1999 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 11/23/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 99-11722 | |
| 12/17/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Certified copy of record due: 120 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] Nos. 35042, 35048, 35049, 35082, 35173, 35202, 35236. | 99-12789 | |
| 03/20/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. Volumes 1 and 2. Mailed on 03/16/00. | 00-04365 | |
| 03/20/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 02/14/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. The State shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether counsels' performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. We further order the State to clarify whether or not appellant was represented by counsel or proceeded in proper person in the district court. | 02-02916 | |
| 03/20/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Answer to Order to Show Cause. | 02-04963 | |
| 07/26/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order." fn13[Because we conclude that an evidentiary hearing is necessary, we decline to reach the merits of Jenkins' other claims. We have also considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and conclude that no further relief is warranted at this time. We also conclude that oral argument and brief are unwarranted.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML | 02-12879 | |
| 08/20/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-13067 | |
| 08/20/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 08/29/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 23, 2002. | 02-13067 | |