Docket Entries |
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
02/19/1998 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | | |
02/19/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast track notice mailed to all counsel.) | | |
02/26/1998 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Court Reporter: Jeanie Wright. | | |
03/23/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Extend Time to file Fast Track Opening Brief (First Request). | | |
03/30/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. The fast track statement shall be filed and served no later than April 13, 1998. | | |
04/15/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Extend Time to File Fast Track Opening Brief (Second Request). | | |
04/16/1998 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. Pursuant to telephonic request of court reporter Marcelene Varney, the rough draft transcript shall be served and filed on or before April 22, 1998. | | |
04/21/1998 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Jury Trial, Vols. 1 through 9 (August 5, 1997, through August 15, 1997.) Court Reporter: Marcelene Varney. | | |
05/18/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. The fast track statement shall be filed and served no later than May 21, 1998. | | |
05/26/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Received Fast Track Statement. Appellant's Fast Track Appendix. | | |
05/28/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Fast Track Statement in Excess of Ten Pages. | | |
05/28/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Received Fast Track Statement. | | |
06/04/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. On May 28, 1998, counsel for appellant filed a motion for leave to file a fast track statement in excess of 10 pages. The motion is granted. The clerk shall file, forthwith, the fast track appendix submitted on May 26, 1998, and the fast track statement submitted on May 28, 1998. | | |
06/04/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | | |
06/04/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. Appellant's Fast Track Appendix. | | |
06/08/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal Based on Non-Compliance with Filing Deadline after Extension Granted by this Court. | | |
06/11/1998 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Response to State's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Motion to Extend time to file Fast Track Opening Brief (Third Request). | | |
06/22/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion. Filed Motion for Fast Track Response in Excess of Ten Pages. | | |
06/22/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Received Fast Track Response. RETURNED UNFILED 6/26/98. | | |
06/22/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Received Fast Track Statement. Respondent's Fast Track Appendix, Vols. 1 and 2. RETURNED UNFILED 6/26/98. | | |
06/26/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. On June 22, 1998, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a fast track response in excess of 10 pages. The proposed fast track response is 30 pages long. Respondent's motion is denied. The clerk shall return, unfiled, the fast track response submitted on June 22, 1998. Respondent shall file a fast track response of no more than 20 pages within 10 days of this order. | | |
06/26/1998 | Other | Other. Returned unfiled with letter: original and two copies of the Fast Track Response and the original and one copy of Respondent's Fast Track Appendix, Vol. 1 and 2. | | |
07/01/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Although respondent is correct that the fast track statement was not timely filed , this court elected to file the fast track statement on June 4, 1998. Accordingly, we conclude that the motion must be denied. Respondent shall have 20 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve the fast track response. (o.k. to file per A.H.) | | |
07/17/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | | |
07/17/1998 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. Respondent's Fast Track Appendix, Vols. I and II. | | |
07/23/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. After reviewing the documents submitted in this appeal, we have determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. The appellant shall file and serve the opening brief within 40 days after the date of this order. fn1[We hereby suspend the requirement in NRAP 9 for counsel to file a certified transcript in this appeal]. The answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. Upon completion of briefing, the clerk shall schedule this appeal for oral argument: 30 minutes. | | |
09/04/1998 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on: 9/2/98). | | |
10/05/1998 | Brief | Filed Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief. (Mailed on: Fed Ex 10/2/98). | | |
11/05/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Extend Time to file Appellant's Reply Brief (first request). | | |
12/10/1998 | Brief | Received Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: 12/8/98). | | |
12/30/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Allow Response to Reply Brief. | | |
02/16/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Appellant's counsel filed a motion to extend time to file appellant's reply brief on November 5, 1998. The motion is completely incomprehesible. We deny the motion for an extension of time. Nonetheless, in the interest of judicial economy, we direct the clerk to file the reply brief provisionally received on December 10, 1998. On December 30, 1998, respondent filed a motion seeking leave to file a two page supplemental brief. We grant the unopposed motion. Respondent shall, within 15 days of the date of this order, file and serve the two page supplemental brief. | | |
02/16/1999 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. | | |
03/03/1999 | Other | Other. Filed Response to Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: Fed Ex 3/2/99). | | |
03/15/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice. Oral Argument is scheduled for May 12, 1999 at the hour of 11:30 a.m.-1/2 hour in Las Vegas. (SNP99A-WM,DA,NB). | | |
04/27/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice. Reminder Notice for Oral Argument. | | |
05/12/1999 | Other | Other. Oral Argument before the Southern Nevada Panel: Submitted. SNP99A-WM/DA/NB. | | |
05/12/1999 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | | |
08/13/1999 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." Agosti, J. Becker, J. concurring. Maupin, J. concurring. SNP99A-WM/DA/NB.
(Order mailed without signature on file stamp. Re-mailed order to cc's on 8/16/99.) | | |
09/07/1999 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Motion for Rehearing. STRICKEN 10/06/99 | | |
09/17/1999 | Other | Other. Returned, unfiled, with letter, Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Rehearing. | | |
10/06/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. On August 13, 1999, we entered an order dismissing this appeal. On September 7, 1999, appellant filed a document entitled "Motion for Rehearing." It appears that appellant's document was inadvertantly filed. We hereby strike the document filed September 7, 1999. The Clerk of this court shall issue the remittitur forthwith. (Stricken: Motion for Rehearing filed September 7, 1999.) | | |
10/06/1999 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | |
10/15/1999 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Entering receipt for Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 11, 1999. REMITTITUR RECALLED 11/12/99. | | |
10/20/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for En Banc Reconsideration. (OK to file per AH). | | |
11/12/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. On October 20, 1999, appellant filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of the order dismissing appeal entered on August 13, 1999. Appellant's motion is not in compliance with our procedural rules. We hereby waive the procedural defects associated with the motion for en banc reconsideration. We hereby recall and stay issuance of the remittitur pending resolution of the motion for en banc reconsideration. SNP99A-WM/DA/NB. | | |
07/03/2000 | Letter/Incoming | Received Letter. Letter from attorney Robert E. Glennen re: documents filed in 1999. | | |
08/08/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Directing Answer and Requesting Amicus Curiae Participation. On August 13, 1999, a three-justice panel of this court issued the attached order dismissing appellant Bolien's appeal. Bolien's petition for en banc reconsideration of the panel's decision is presently pending before this court. It appears that additional briefing may assist this court in deciding whether en banc reconsideration is warranted. The Attorney Geneal and the Nye County District Attorney shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file an answer to the petition for en banc reconsideration. In addition, it appears that the participation and briefing by amicus curiae may ensure that the above-noted issues are fully argued and presented to this court. This court requests the office of the State Public Defender and the Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice to each advise this court within 20 days of the date of this order whether they are able to participate in this matter as amicus curiae for the purpose of addressing the issues identified above. | | 00-13717 |
08/25/2000 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. Letter from David F. Sarnowski, Chief Deputy A.G. regarding Answer to Rehearing. | | 00-14991 |
08/28/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response of State Public Defender to Request for Amicus Curiae Participation and Request for Briefing. | | 00-15087 |
08/28/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion for Excess Pages. Motion for Court's Permission t Submit Court-Ordered Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration in Excess of Ten Pages. | | 00-15094 |
08/28/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response of Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice to Request for Amicus Curiae Participation. | | 00-15102 |
08/30/2000 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order. The thirteen-page answer to petition for en banc reconsideration, provisionally received on August 28, 2000, shall be filed, forthwith. | | 00-15230 |
08/30/2000 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Answer to Petition for Rehearing. Court-Ordered Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. | | 00-15098 |
08/31/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On August 28, 2000, the NSPD and the NACJ informed this court that they are pleased to participate in this matter as amici curiae. The NSPD and the NACJ shall each have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an amicus curiae brief addressing the issues set forth in our order entered on August 8, 2000. Respondent shall have 20 days from filing of the amici curiae briefs to file answering briefs. On August 25, 2000, the clerk of this court received a letter from the Office of the Attorney General informing this court that it is a nominal representative of the state and that the response to the petition for en banc reconsideration will be filed by the Nye County District Attorney. The Nye County District Attorney having filed the response on August 30, 2000, the state's responsibility to file a response is deemed completed. | | 00-15339 |
10/02/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to file Amicus Brief. (Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice) | | 00-17308 |
10/02/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion to Extend Time in which to File Amicus Brief. (from State Public Defender) | | 00-17402 |
10/05/2000 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Granting Motion. The motions filed on October 2, 2000, are granted. Amici Curiae Nevada State Public Defender and Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice shall have to and including October 16, 2000, within which to file and serve their amicus briefs. | | 00-17692 |
10/05/2000 | Brief | Filed Amicus Brief. Amicus Curiae Brief on Nevada State Public Defender. | | 00-17776 |
10/18/2000 | Brief | Filed Amicus Brief. Amicus Brief of Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice. | | 00-18467 |
12/05/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Denying Reconsideration. This is a motion by appellant for en banc reconsideration of the order dismissing this appeal. "We conclude that appellant has not demonstrated that en banc reconsideration is warranted." fn1[On November 12, 1999, this court recalled and stayed issuance of the remittitur pending resolution of appellant's motion. This matter having been resolved, we direct the clerk of this court to issue the remittitur.] En Banc-CY/WM/MS/DA/ML/NB. RR dissenting. | | 00-21179 |
12/05/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 00-21219 |
12/05/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
12/22/2000 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 7, 2000. | | 00-21219 |
03/26/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed March 5, 2001 and placed on the docket as Case No. 00-9049 (no action required). | | 01-05228 |
05/21/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. (No action required.) | | 01-08392 |