judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

GALINDO VS. GALINDO

Case Information: 42559
Short Caption:GALINDO VS. GALINDOCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D295720Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:03/16/2004 / Reed, NathanielSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/30/2003Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Cesar Anthony Galindo - check no. 3053.
12/30/2003Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 03-21609
02/11/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Association of Counsel. The law firm of Garcia-Mendoza & Snavely has associated with appellant in proper person as co-counsel . 04-02705
02/27/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Settlement Conference. 04-03754
03/10/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On February 11, 2004, attorney Eva Garcia-Mendoza filed a document entitled 'Association of Counsel' which is treated as a notice of appearance on behalf of appellant. Appellant shall proceed hereafter by and through his counsel of record. The clerk of this court shall mail to appellant a docketing statement. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve the docketing statement. We grant appellant's motion for this appeal to be assigned to the settlement conference program. The clerk shall assign this appeal to the settlement conference program. Briefing and compliance with NRAP 9(a) are suspended until further order of this court. 04-04508
03/15/2004Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from Eva Garcia-Mendoza regarding scheduling this matter for settlement conference. 04-04843
03/16/2004Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Nathaniel J. Reed. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
03/17/2004Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 04-05034
03/19/2004Notice/Outgoing Letter. Nathaniel J. Reed. (docketing statement)
04/21/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Returning Proper Person Document. On December 30, 2003, this court received a proper person motion from appellant. On February 11, 2004, attorney Eva Garcia-Mendoza filed a notice of appearance on behalf of appellant. Because appellant is now represented by counsel, we decline to grant him permission to file documents in proper person. See NRAP 46(b). The clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the proper person document received on December 30, 2003. Appellant may refile the motion through his counsel of record. 04-07351
04/21/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to appellant Cesar Anthony Galindo. Returned unfiled, the original "Proper Person Motion to Stay Lump Sum alimony Award, to Vacate Decree of Divorce, Pending Order of Supreme Court received on December 26, 2003."
04/21/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: May 21, 2004. 04-07359
05/24/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: July 20, 2004. 04-09544
07/23/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: August 11, 2004. 04-13451
08/16/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: August 26, 2004. 04-14817
09/24/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. 04-17703
09/24/2004Settlement AgreementFiled Settlement Agreement.
10/01/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The settlement judge has filed a report indicating that the parties have agreed to a settlement. Appellant shall have 30 days to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. 04-18221
11/03/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Affidavit of Eva Garcia-Mendoza, Esq. in Reply to Order filed October 1, 2004 (Motion for extension of time to allow parties to get Amended Decree signed, filed and the Appeal dismissed). 04-20254
11/04/2004Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. The affidavit filed on November 3, 2004 is treated as a motion. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal. 04-20356
12/06/2004MotionFiled Motion. Appellant's Motion to Compel Respondent to Sign the Amended Divorce Decree Prepared Pursuant to the Signed Settlement Statement Held on 09/17/04 with the Supreme Court Settlement Judge. 04-22224
06/22/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Because the settlement judge had filed a report indicating that the parties had agreed to a settlement of this appeal, this court entered an order directing appellant to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss or to otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal. In response to that order, appellant filed a 'Motion to Compel Respondent to Sign the Amended Divorce Decree Prepared Pursuant to the Signed Settlement Statement.' We note that determining whether the parties have executed an enforceable settlement agreement would require fact-finding, a task for which this court is not suited. We decline to make such a determination in this case and we deny appellant's motion. Appellant and respondent shall each have 20 days from the date of this order to file a response informing this court of the status of this appeal. If parties have agreed to settle this matter they shall file a motion to dismiss the appeal and to remand the matter to the district for any proceedings that may be necessary to effectuate the settlement agreement. If the parties have been unable to complete their settlement agreement, each shall so inform this court in their response to this order and this appeal will proceed to briefing. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 05-12239
06/24/2005Settlement Program Motion/StipulationFiled Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. 05-12484
06/28/2005Order/DispositionalFiled Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference, the stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). SNP/CLK 05-12683
06/28/2005Case Status Update Case Closed. No remittitur issued.