judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOHN KATKISH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Information: 97-CV-1814
Short Caption:JOHN KATKISH V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAClassification:Appeals - Civil - Torts
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CA22-95Filed Date:11/12/1997

Opening Event Date:11/12/1997Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/28/1999Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:02/08/2000
Argued/Submitted:09/12/2000
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/09/2000

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJohn Katkish N
Timothy Guy Smith YN
AppelleeDistrict of ColumbiaN
James C. McKay, Jr.YY
Charles L. Reischel NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/12/1997NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/24/1997RECEIVED - ADS
12/19/1997RECEIVED - ADS
12/19/1997$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
01/23/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS
01/23/1998RECEIVED - ADS (RT Ordered) (vvd)
01/23/1998MOTION(S) FEE PAID
01/23/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to transmit the record for addtitional 30 days
01/23/1998MOTION(S) FEE PAID
03/06/1998ORDERED that the motion of appellant for leave to file the lodged docketing statement is granted, and the lodged docketing statement is filed. It is F/O that the motion of appellant for an extension of time to transmit the record is granted to the extent that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the designation of record and statement regardign transcript with Superior Court, Office of Appeals Coordinator, Room 3148, and shall simultaneously file a copy of those documents with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time, and this court's $10 motion fee. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (BY: JAC for GP)
03/06/1998APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
03/16/1998RECEIVED - aplt's motion for leave to file designation of record and statement regarding transcript
03/16/1998NOTICE SENT - to aplt's attorney re: rule 27 on motion for leave to file designation of record and statement regarding transcripts
03/16/1998MOTION(S) FEE PAID
03/27/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DR & SRT (no oppo).
03/27/1998RECEIVED designation of record
03/27/1998RECEIVED statement regarding transcript.
04/02/1998ORDER: Grant motion of appellant for leave to file the lodged designation of record and statement regarding transcript, and the lodged designation of record and statement regarding transcript are filed. (By: JAC)
04/02/1998DESIGNATION OF RECORD
04/02/1998STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)
06/08/1998RECORD ON APPEAL
09/10/1998SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (360 pgs/Ramos) 1/21-23/97 proc.
12/15/1998ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: JAC)
01/22/1999APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days from the date the missing transcript is filed. (vvd)
01/22/1999MOTION(S) FEE PAID
02/16/1999ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, advise this court, with specificity, of what transcript is still outstanding and of all actions appellant has taken, including those taken since the date appellant filed the motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to assure the transmittal of that transcript to this court. See D.C. App. R. 10. It is F/O that the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief is hereby held in abeyance pending appellant's response to this order. (BY: AMW)
02/26/1999STATEMENT - to 2/16/99 order
03/08/1999ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellant shall be filed within 30 days from the date the transcript of the proceeding of January 28, 1997, is filed with this court. It is F/O that appellant shall advise this court within 15 days thereof of appellant's receipt of the ordered transcripts. (BY: JAC)
10/28/1999RECORD COMPLETED
10/28/1999SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (135-pgs/coney 1/28/97 proc )
11/04/1999 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief_ of appellant_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of appellee_ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By:} GP)
12/01/1999APPELLANT'S BRIEF w/ rule 34 compilation
01/05/2000APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days
02/03/2000RECEIVED - aple's brief
02/08/2000 On consideration of the motion of appellee_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellee is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (By: GP)
02/08/2000APPELLEE'S BRIEF
02/08/2000BRIEFS COMPLETED
02/29/2000FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
02/29/2000LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
03/31/2000SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (135-pgs/coney 1/28/97 proc.)
07/18/2000LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Mckay)
07/25/2000CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
09/12/2000FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
09/12/2000ARGUED (SC,RU,WS) Timothy Guy Smith, Esq., for appellant. James C. McKay, Jr., ESq., for appellant.
10/18/2000AFFIRMED MOJ (SC,RU,WS)
10/25/2000APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to publish
11/09/2000MANDATE ISSUED
12/28/2000ORDER motion to publish is granted. (SC,RU,WS)