judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

ANTHONY REDCROSS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL

Case Information: 99-SP-1316
Short Caption:ANTHONY REDCROSS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET ALClassification:Appeals - Special Proceedings - Other Special Proceedings
Lead: 99-SP-0924 Consolidated:99-SP-1316
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:SP1625-99Filed Date:09/13/1999

Opening Event Date:09/13/1999Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/25/1999Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:08/06/2001
Argued/Submitted:01/24/2002
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:03/15/2002
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantAnthony Redcross Y
Steven H. SchiffYN
AppelleeD.C. Board of ParoleN
Charles L. Reischel NN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN
Valinda JonesNN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
06/20/1971error
09/13/1999NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by: Jeff Orchard 202 333-6173 439-582
10/25/1999RECORD ON APPEAL
10/25/1999RECORD COMPLETED
12/06/1999ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS numbers 99-SP-924 & 99-SP-1316 for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Jeff Orchard, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statements for both appeals. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: AMW)
12/06/1999APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Jeffrey Orchard, Esquire
02/01/2000ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement and brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file these documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file these documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (BY: GPJ)
02/28/2000APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS no oppo
02/28/2000RECEIVED - aplt's docketing statement
03/17/2000ORDER: Grant motion of appellant for leave to file the docketing statement, and the lodged docketing statement is hereby filed. FO that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP)
03/17/2000APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
04/25/2000ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (BY:AMW)
06/06/2000COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS
08/31/2000ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appointment of Jeffrey Francis Orchard, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and Steven H. Schiff, Esquire is appointed to represent appellant herein. Jeffrey Francis Orchard, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY AMW)
08/31/2000APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Steven H. Schiff, Esquire
10/10/2000APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 60 days
10/25/2000 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before December 11, 2000. (by GP)
12/11/2000APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until all documents are recvd from prior counsel. no oppo
03/07/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 30 days from counsel's receipt of the missing materials from former counsel. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the former counsel shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, comply with this court's order of August 31, 2000. Failure to comply with order may result in the issuance of an order directing attorney Jeffrey Francis Orchard to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failure to comply with the orders of this court, and may result in the referral to Bar Counsel. (By: AMW)
03/28/2001APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE no oppo
03/28/2001RECEIVED - response to court's ord of 8/31/01.
04/11/2001ORDERED: Grant the motion of former counsel, and the lodged response is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that current counsel shall file the brief of appellant within 40 days from the date of this order. (By: GP)
04/11/2001APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE
05/29/2001APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo for 30 days
06/04/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before June 20, 2001. (By: GP)
06/20/2001APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 10 days
07/02/2001RECEIVED - aplt's brief
07/12/2001 On consideration of the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, and the lodged brief, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant is granted, and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee_ shall be filed with this court on or before August 6, 2001. (By: GP)
07/12/2001APPELLANT'S BRIEF
08/06/2001NOTICE by D.C. that it takes no position on the merits of this appeal.
08/06/2001BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/30/2001FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
12/05/2001CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
01/24/2002FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/24/2002SUBMITTED (TE,WH,KN)
01/28/2002Upon consideratin of appellant's appeals from the trial court's denial of his habeas corpus challenges to decisions of the United States Parole Commission's denying parole, and the notice of the District of Columbia that it takes no position on the merits of these appeals, and it appearing that the records of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons indicate that appellant was released from custody in January 2001, it is ORDERED that the United States is invited to respond to appellant's appeals within 20 days from the date of this order. (TEWHKN)
02/19/2002APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL as moot aplt's appeal of the denial of his writ of habeas corpus
02/21/2002ORDERED that the motion of appellee, the United States, is granted, and appeals nos. 99-SP-924 and 99-SP-1316 are hereby dismissed as moot. (TEWHKN)
02/21/2002DISMISSED
03/15/2002MANDATE ISSUED
04/30/2002RECEIVED - aplt's motion to dismiss cases closed 2/21/02 sent motion back