| Case Information: 48083 | |||
| Short Caption: | APCO CONSTRUCTION VS. DIST. CT. (CLARK CO.) | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A527798 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/21/2006 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 09/21/2006 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. and for Stay of Further Proceedings. (Filed via fax.) | 06-19431 | |
| 09/22/2006 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Original. (Filed via fax on 9/21/06) | 06-19431 | |
| 09/22/2006 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Volumes 1 through 4 | 06-19496 | |
| 09/22/2006 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Fennemore Craig, P.C.--check no. 1004. | ||
| 09/25/2006 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition of McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. to the Request for Stay Included in the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by APCO Construction. | 06-19575 | |
| 09/25/2006 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Intervene. | 06-19659 | |
| 09/25/2006 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Clark County's Opposition to Plaintiff's Petition for Stay of Further Proceedings (filed via fax). | 06-19660 | |
| 09/25/2006 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Joinder. Petition in Support of APCO Construction's Petition for Writ of Mandamus.clerk3 09/26/06 Order-fn5: Granite does not have standing to intervene - this joinder was stricken.jcr | 06-19658 | |
| 09/25/2006 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Errata. Errat to Opposition of McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., to the Request for Stay Included in the Petiton for Writ of Mandamus Filed by Apco Construction. (filed via fax). | 06-19662 | |
| 09/26/2006 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Certificate of Facsimile of Clark County's Opposition to Plaintiff's Petition for Stay of Further Proceedings (filed via fax). | 06-19674 | |
| 09/26/2006 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Errata. Errata to Opposition of McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., to the Request for Stay Included in the Petiton for Writ of Mandamus Filed by Apco Construction. (ORIGINAL--filed via fax on 9/25/06). | 06-19662 | |
| 09/26/2006 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Clark County's Opposition to Plaintiff's Petition for Stay of Further Proceedings (ORIGINAL--filed via fax on 9/25/06). | 06-19660 | |
| 09/26/2006 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. for Writ of Mandamus. "We deny the petition." fn5[We deny petitioner Granite Construction Company's motion to intervene in this matter. Because Granite does not have standing to intervene, we direct the clerk to strike Granite's "Joinder Petition in Support of APCO Construction[.]"] fn6[We deny as moot petitioner's request for a stay.] SNP07M-WM/MG/JH | 06-19699 | |
| 09/27/2006 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 09/27/2006 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Motion for Reconsideration. | 06-19774 | |
| 09/27/2006 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Filing Fee on Rehearing. Due date: 10 days. | ||
| 09/28/2006 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Fennemore Craig, P.C.--check no. 1006. | ||
| 09/29/2006 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition of McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., to Petitioner APCO's Motion for Reconsideration. | 06-20085 | |
| 10/03/2006 | Other | Returned Mail. Notice issued 09/27/06 addressed to Fennmore Craig remailed to same address. | ||
| 10/11/2006 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. fn1[Because we did not direct McCarthy Building to file a response, its opposition was not considered in our resolution of the rehearing petition.] "The petition for rehearing is denied." fn3[Nothing in our September 29 order precludes petitioner from seeking a stay in the course of an appeal. A motion for a stay should properly be sought in the district court in the first instance.] fn4[The Honorable A. William Maupin, Justice, did not participate in the decision of this rehearing petition.] | 06-20807 | |
| 11/07/2006 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 06-22252 | |
| 11/07/2006 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||