| Case Information: 44210 | |||
| Short Caption: | WHEELER (ROBERT) VS. WARDEN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR030377 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Life - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Hardesty | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 12/28/2004 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/04/2004 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 11/04/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 04-20371 | |
| 12/02/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record. Record due: 30 days. See NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings.) fn1[The record shall not include any physical, non-documentary exhibits or the original documentary exhibits filed in the district court, but copies of documentary exhibits submitted in the district court proceedings shall be transmitted as part of the record on appeal. The record shall also include any presentence investigation reports submitted in this matter. The clerk of the district court shall transmit the reports to this court in a sealed envelope identifying the contents and marked confidential.] | 04-21967 | |
| 12/28/2004 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. | 04-23590 | |
| 12/28/2004 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 01/03/2005 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Hardesty. Sat in district court proceedings. | ||
| 03/04/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that appellant is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn8[We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions that were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.] NNP05-WM/MD/RP | 05-04262 | |
| 03/29/2005 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 05-04709 | |
| 03/29/2005 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 04/07/2005 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on April 1, 2005. | 05-04709 | |