judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

IN RE: GARY MANDEL

Case Information: 85-BG-1648
Short Caption:IN RE: GARY MANDELClassification:Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:Filed Date:

Opening Event Date:Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:10/10/1990
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerBar CounselN
Leonard H. Becker NN
Wallace E. Shipp YN
Thomas E. Flynn NN
PetitionerBoard on Professional ResponsibilityN
Charles R. Donnenfeld NN
George W. Miller NN
RespondentGary Mandel NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/01/1901MANDEL, GARY IN THE MATTER OF:
01/01/1902CASE STAYED PENDG DISP OF EN BANC PET IN 88-1563
01/01/1903NOTE - 01 022486 ORD: SUSPENDING RESP & NOTE - 01 BPR TO INSTITUTE FORMAL NOTE - 02 PROCEEDINGS FOR DETERMINATION NOTE - 02 OF NATURE OF FINAL DISCIPLINE NOTE - 03 TO BE IMPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE NOTE - 03 OF DETERIMING WHETHER OR NOT NOTE - 04 THE CRIME INVOLVES MORAL NOTE - 04 TURPITUDE; CLERK TO CAUSE NOTE - 05 COPY OF THIS ORD TO BE NOTE - 05 TRANSMITTED TO BPR & RESP NOTE - 06 THEREBY NOTIFYING RESP ON RULE NOTE - 06 XI, SEC 19. NOTE - 07 100986 ORD: GRANT REQUEST TO NOTE - 07 DEFER PROCEEDINGS & CLERK TO NOTE - 08 REMOVE CASE FROM 10/29/86 NOTE - 08 SUMM CALENDAR; RESP TO INFORM NOTE - 09 THIS CRT IMMEDIATELY UPON DISP NOTE - 09 OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING IN THE NOTE - 10 USCA FOR THE 4TH CIRCUIT. NOTE - 10 NOTE - 11 071487 ORDER: RESPONDENT IN 20 NOTE - 11 DAYS OTSC WHY HE SHLD NOT BE NOTE - 12 HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT RE: NOTE - 12 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE XI NOTE - 13 sec. 19; FO: RESPONDENT W/IN NOTE - 13 10 DAYS TO FILE STATE RE: NOTE - 14 STATUS OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING NOTE - 14 BEFORE USCA FOR THE 4TH CIRCT.
01/01/1905TRDATE- 90/10/10 ACTION - MEMO ATTY 1 - HERMANE FOR - PETITIONER ATTY 2 - MANDELG FOR - pro se
12/11/1985CERTIFIED COPY OF COURT DOCKET FROM THE USDC PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
01/08/1986ORDER RESPONDENT IN 15 DAYS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE SUSPENDED. PANELPY SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
02/24/1986MEMORANDUM NOTICE OF SUSPENSION FROM THE CRT OF APPEALS OF MD. ACG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
02/24/1986ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01-06 PANELPY SCDATE 012386 SCHPRD RPR
05/13/1986REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
09/15/1986MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION RESPONDENT'S REQUEST TO DEFER PROCEEDINGS. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
10/09/1986ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 07-10. ACG PANELPY SCDATE 092286 SCHPRD VS
07/14/1987ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 11 - 14. EBP PANELPY SCDATE 020287 SCHPRD CHECK
11/06/1989RECEIVED COPY OF ORD FROM U.S.D.C. OF MD REINSTATING RESPONDENT. CWC PANEL SCDATE 080188 SCHPRD CHECK
12/06/1989LETTER FROM B.COUNSEL ADIVISG THIS CT THAT RESP'S MATTER BEFORE USCA FOR 4TH CIRCUIT IS COMPLETE. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
08/13/1990ORDER CLK TO RESTORE THIS MATTER TO THE SUMMARY CALENDAR. CWC PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
09/06/1990RESPONDENT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT (RESPONDENT'S) CWC PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
09/21/1990ORDER GRNT REQ OF RESP FOR ARG ON SUM CAL OF 10/10/90 AT 1:30 PM DAS PANELRBH SCDATE 091490 SCHPRD VS
10/10/1990FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
10/10/1990MEMORANDUM ARGUED BEFORE JJ RG/ST/MK PANELRGSTMK SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
10/10/1990ARGUED
01/04/1991ORDER THIS CASE IS HEREBY STAYED PDG DECISION OF THE EN BANC COURT IN NO. 88-1563 IN RE MCBRIDE PANELROSTMK SCDATE 101090 SCHPRD RDEC
02/03/1992MEMORANDUM REMINDER MCBRIDE CASE DECIDED. MEH PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
03/27/1992AFFIDAVIT of respondent, pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 14(f)
03/29/1992REMANDED Opinion. Accordingly, in view of our remand in Hopmayer, we remand the instant case for a recommendation from the Board on whether drug addiction, commencing with the lawful prescription of drugs, if a substantial factor in criminal action underlying a felony conviction, may be mitigating factor in imposing a disciplinary saction in a per se crime of moral turpitude under D.C. Code Sec 11-2503 (a) (1989). If so, then in view of the findings of the Maryland Court of Appeals concerning the addiction, the Board should determine what alternative sanction may be appropriate for Mandel. (By RO, ST, MK)
07/22/1992REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. Recommending respondent be disbarred pursuant to DC Code sec 11-2503(a).
09/16/1992REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. Board's recommendation that the Court disbar respondent on consent pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 12(b) nunc pro tunc to February 24, 1986.
09/21/1992PETITIONER'S RESPONSE Bar Counsel's response to the R&R advising they do not note an exception.
09/29/1992AFFIDAVIT of respondent, pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 14(f)
09/29/1992AFFIDAVIT of respondent, pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 14(f)
09/29/1992DISBARRED ON CONSENT ORDERED that the said Gary Steven Mandel is disbarred on consent, nunc pro tunc to February 24, 1986. The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the court. (By RO, ST, MK)
10/08/1992AFFIDAVIT of respondent, pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 14(f)