| Case Information: 40139 | |||
| Short Caption: | CUNNINGHAM (JERALD) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 32234 , 32601 , 36001 , 36129 , 46135 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Carson City - First Judicial District - C48099 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Life - Other/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 01/24/2003 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/30/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 08/30/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 02-15127 | |
| 09/26/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 120 days. See NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 02-16726 | |
| 01/24/2003 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 through 4. | 03-01348 | |
| 01/24/2003 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 06/04/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that appellant is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn8[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP03-MS/ML/NB | 03-09359 | |
| 06/24/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). fn 1[To the extent that Cunningham requests en banc reconsideration, Cunningham's request is improper. See NRAP 40A(b).] SNP03-MS/ML/NB | 03-10593 | |
| 07/15/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC | 03-11939 | |
| 07/22/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 03-10910 | |
| 07/22/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 07/23/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. No good cause having been shown, appellant's motion to stay the issuance of the remittitur is hereby denied. Moreover, appellant's proper person request for a "copy of the respondent's indictment and probable cause judgment" is also denied. | 03-12490 | |
| 07/31/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 24, 2003. | 03-10910 | |
| 09/02/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed August 7, 2003 and placed on the docket as Case No. 03-6013. | 03-14668 | |
| 10/27/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. | 03-17873 | |