| Case Information: 40107 | |||
| Short Caption: | IN RE: ESTATE OF ACHTTIEN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 40623 , 44022 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Douglas Co. - Ninth Judicial District - 02PB0001 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 11/27/2002 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/22/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 08/22/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 02-14442 | |
| 08/22/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 09/18/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Nancy Achttien Clapp-check no. 1153. | ||
| 10/16/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Motion for Order Denying Permission to File Forensic Examiner's Report. | 02-18023 | |
| 11/04/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn 2[The record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well a any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings). fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 02-18919 | |
| 11/27/2002 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 and 2. | 02-20472 | |
| 11/27/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 07/08/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On July 7, 2003, appellant submitted a motion to stay the sale of real property, which appellant contends is part of the estate. The sale is scheduled for July 9, 2003, at 10:30 a.m. In determining whether to grant a stay pending appeal, this court considers the following factors: (1) whether the object of an appeal will be defeated if the stay is denied; (2) whether appellant will suffer irreparable or serious injury if the stay is denied; (3) whether respondent will suffer irreparable or serious injury if the stay is granted; and (4) whether appellant is likely to prevail on the merits in an appeal. We have considered these factors and have determined that they weigh against granting a stay. Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion. Fn1 [Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] | 03-11418 | |
| 01/29/2004 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from T. Scott Brooke of the law firm of Brooke, Shaw & Zumpft regarding the status of this case. | 04-01930 | |
| 04/29/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion. Request for Submission of Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Motion for Order Denying Permission to File Forensic Examiner's Report. | 04-07918 | |
| 06/07/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. "We affirm the district court's order in its totality." fn2[Although appellant has not been granted permission to file documents in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered all proper person documents received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted. Furthermore, we deny as moot respondent's motion t to dismiss and motion for order denying permission to file forensic examiner's report.] SNP04S-MS/RR/MD | 04-10411 | |
| 07/02/2004 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 04-10654 | |
| 07/02/2004 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 08/03/2004 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 7, 2004. | 04-10654 | |