Case Information: 10-AA-0778 | |||
Short Caption: | HARVEY JOHNSON V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation |
Lead: | 10-AA-0778 | Consolidated: | 10-AA-0845 |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CRB67-10 | Filed Date: | 06/30/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 06/30/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 08/03/2010 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 09/09/2010 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Intervenor | Knot Shop (the)/tie Rack Inc.& Hartford Ins | N |
| ||||||
Petitioner | Harvey Johnson | N |
| ||||||
Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp. | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
06/30/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
06/30/2010 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
06/30/2010 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, Todd Kim, Esq. & Gregory Lamb, Esq. | |||
07/13/2010 | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE - The Knot Shop/ Tie Rack Inc. and Hartford Insurance Compancy ****CC: on OTSC - WILL BE ADDRESSED ON FINAL ORD LW | |||
07/19/2010 | ORDERED that PETITIONER shall W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-FINAL ORDER. See Washington Hospital Center v. DC Dept. of Emply Srv, 712 A.2d 1018 (DC 1998). (BY: ETW) | |||
07/26/2010 | ORDERED that the MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE IS GRANTED and the Clerk shall enter the appearance of THE KNOT SHOP/TIE RACK, INC. and THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANIES AS INTERVENORS in APPEAL NO. 10-AA-778. It is *****MORE***** | |||
07/26/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED, SS, that APPEALS NOS. 10AA778 and 10AA845 ARE HEREBY CONSOLIDATED for all purposes herein. It is *****MORE***** | |||
07/26/2010 | FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners in APPEAL NO. 10AA845 shall, W/N 20 DAYS fromthe date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why the appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-FINAL ORDER. See Washington Hosp. Center v. DC Dept of Emplyment Srv, 712 A.2d 1018 (DC 1998).(BY :ETW) | |||
08/03/2010 | RECORD ON APPEAL (10-AA-778) | |||
08/03/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD (8/26/09 proc.) | |||
08/03/2010 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
08/09/2010 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL both petitoners | |||
08/18/2010 | ORDERED that the JOINT MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of these appeals IS GRANTED and these appeals are hereby DISMISSED. (BY: ETW) lw | |||
08/18/2010 | DISMISSED | |||
09/09/2010 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
04/18/2014 | Filed | Archived |