judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ISSURDUTT VS. HYMANSON

Case Information: 40289
Short Caption:ISSURDUTT VS. HYMANSONCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A417438Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:11/15/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/30/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Yasmine U. Issurdutt--check no. 1754.
09/30/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-16836
11/04/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn 2[The record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well a any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings). fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-18908
11/15/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 through 11. 02-19723
11/15/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
01/22/2003MotionFiled Motion. Request for Leave to File Sur-Opposition or in the Alternative to Strike Appellants' Reply Brief. 03-01161
02/20/2003Other Incoming DocumentReceived Proper Person Document. Appellants' Request for Leave to file a Response to Respondents' Request for Leave and Sur-Opposition and Request for Sanctions. 03-02870
03/09/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. for Leave to File Briefs in Proper Person. Appellants submitted a motion for leave to file documents in proper person under NRAP 46(b). Respondents opposed appellants' motion. fn1[We direct the clerk of this court to file the November 25, 2002 motion and the December 6, 2002 opposition.] We grant appellants' motions to file a reply and to submit a response to respondents' sur-opposition, and we grant respondents' motion to file a sur-opposition. fn2[Respondents' alternative request to strike appellants' reply is denied as moot. The clerk shall file appellants' January 12, 2003 and February 20, 2003 motions, and shall detach and file the exhibits thereto. The clerk shall also detach and file respondents' sur-opposition, provisionally received on January 22, 2003.] We grant appellants' motion for leave to file documents for the limited purpose of filing briefs. Appellants shall have 60 days from the date of this order to file and serve their opening brief. Respondents shall then have 30 days from the date that appellants' opening brief is served to file and serve any answering brief. Appellants may file and serve a reply brief within 30 days from the date that any answering brief is served. There is no need to file appendices, as the record on appeal was filed with this court on November 15, 2002. We deny appellants' February 20, 2003 request for sanctions. 05-04735
03/09/2005MotionFiled Proper Person Motion. Motion to Represent Pro Per. 02-20264
03/09/2005MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellants' Motion to Represent Pro Per. 02-20915
03/09/2005MotionFiled Proper Person Motion. Appellants' Request to Submit a Reply to Respondents' Opposition to Appellants' Motion to Represent Pro Per. 03-00685
03/09/2005Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Appellants' Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Appellants' Motion to Represent Pro Per. (03/09/05 Order-fn2: detached and filed the exhibits attached to the motion received January 12, 2003). 05-04747
03/09/2005Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Appellants' Request for Leave to file a Response to Respondents' Request for Leave and Sur-Opposition and Request for Sanctions. 03-02870
03/09/2005Other Incoming DocumentFiled Proper Person Document. Appellants' Response to Respondents' Request for Leave, and Sur-Opposition, and Request for Sanctions. (03/09/05 Order-fn2: detached and filed the exhibits attached to the motion received February 20, 2003). 05-04748
03/09/2005MotionFiled Reply to Response. Respondents' Sur-Opposition to Appellants Motion to Represent Pro Per. (03/09/05 Order-fn2: detached and filed the exhibits attached to the motion Filed January 122, 2003). 05-04751
05/09/2005BriefFiled Opening Brief. 05-09064
06/08/2005BriefFiled Answering Brief. 05-11305
07/11/2005BriefFiled Reply Brief. 05-13690
07/13/2005Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. received from Tulsie Issurdutt. 05-13909
04/14/2006Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to Clark County Clerk regarding Transmission of additional documents.
04/20/2006Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Documents from District Court Clerk - Filed certified copy of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed in district court on June 24, 2002. 12-00893
04/21/2006Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn16[We have received and considered the July 13, 2005 letter from the Issurdutts. The request that sanctions be imposed against respondents is denied.] NNP06-RR/MD/RP 06-08495
05/10/2006Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
05/10/2006Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Proper Person Petition for Rehearing. 06-09743
05/17/2006Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Yasmine U. Issurdutt-check no. 854.
06/30/2006Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). NNP06R-RR/MD/RP 06-13624
07/12/2006Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. 06-14376
07/12/2006Other Other. Received cover letter for en banc petition under separate cover.
07/26/2006RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 06-15550
07/26/2006Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/02/2006RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 28, 2006. 06-15550
11/01/2006Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC 06-22307