judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

WILLIAMS VS. WILLIAMS

Case Information: 40324
Short Caption:WILLIAMS VS. WILLIAMSCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - DV0100508Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:03/19/2003 / Levitt, LansfordSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:02/19/2004 at 10:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:02/19/2004How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/08/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Jeffrey Friedman - check no. 1335.
10/08/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 02-17365
12/06/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement and either a transcript request form or a certificate indicating that no transcripts are being requested. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 02-20891
12/17/2002Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 02-21550
01/14/2003Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: April 18, 2002. To Court Reporter: Joan Dotson. 03-00743
01/21/2003TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: April 18, 2002. Court Reporter: Joan Marie Dotson. 03-01091
02/13/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. When this appeal was docketed, respondent was listed as a proper person party. It is unclear whether respondent is in proper person or is represented by Mr. Cornell in this appeal. If Mr. Cornell represents respondent, he shall file a notice of appearance with this court within 15 days. If respondent is not represented by counsel in this appeal, appellant shall file proof of service of the docketing statement upon respondent in proper person within 15 days or otherwise inform this court of his knowledge regarding respondent's status in this appeal within that same time period. If Mr. Cornell does represent respondent in this appeal, this matter may be assigned to this court's settlement program. If respondent will not be retaining counsel for this appeal, we remind her that this matter will be submitted for decision upon the filing of appellant's opening brief. 03-02551
02/19/2003Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Request for Clarification. 03-02788
02/19/2003Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Representing respondent: Richard F. Cornell. 03-02813
03/19/2003Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Lansford W. Levitt. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
04/11/2003Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 03-06164
04/17/2003Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. We reinstate the briefing schedule. Appellant: 70 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 03-06545
06/26/2003BriefFiled Opening Brief. 03-10755
06/26/2003AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 03-10756
06/30/2003Other Other. Received table of contents to Appendix filed on 06/26/03. (Attached to inside front cover of appendix.)
07/25/2003BriefFiled Answering Brief. 03-12619
07/25/2003AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. 03-12620
08/26/2003BriefFiled Reply Brief. 03-14360
09/08/2003MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Allow Reprinting and Repagination of Appellant's Opening and Reply Briefs. 03-15008
10/27/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed September 8, 2003. Appellant shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file a corrected opening brief and a corrected reply brief containing line spacing and pagination in compliance with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. See NRAP 32. 03-17901
11/07/2003BriefFiled Opening Brief. Corrected (Reprinted) Opening Brief. 03-18679
11/07/2003BriefFiled Reply Brief. Corrected (Reprinted) Reply Brief. 03-18680
12/23/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on February 19, 2004 at 10:30 a.m. (NNP04-NB/DA/MG)
02/05/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authorities. 04-02341
02/06/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
02/06/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. This appeal is scheduled for oral argument before the Northern Nevada Panel on February 19, 2004. On February 5, 2004, respondent filed a 'Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authorities.' We note that respondent has not addressed the untimeliness of the motion or set forth any cause for the motion. Nevertheless, the motion is granted. The clerk shall file the supplemental authorities received on February 5, 2004. 04-02411
02/06/2004BriefFiled Supplemental Authorities. Respondent's Supplemental Authorities. 04-02342
02/19/2004Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP04-NB/DA/MG
09/13/2004Opinion/DispositionalFiled Per Curiam Opinion. "Affirmed in part and reversed in part." Before Becker, Agosti and Gibbons, JJ. Author: Per Curiam. 120 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 64. NNP04 04-16680
09/24/2004Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Law Offices of Richard F. Cornell--check no. 10707.
09/24/2004Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. (Respondent Marcie Williams) 04-17695
09/24/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Modification of Record and for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing. 04-17758
10/20/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On September 24, 2004, appellant filed a motion for 'modification of the record as provided in NRAP 10' and to extend the time to file a petition for rehearing. We deny appellant's motion to modify the appellate court record. On September 29, 2004, this court received appellant's petition for rehearing. Because we have denied appellant's motion to modify the appellate court record and because appellant's petition cites to the documents discussed in and appended to the motion to modify the record, we direct the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the petition for rehearing received on September 29, 2004. We deny, as moot, appellant's motion for an extension of time. If still necessary, appellant shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file and serve an amended petition for rehearing that does not refer to the documents discussed in and appended to the motion to modify the record. 04-19366
10/28/2004Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. 04-19947
11/09/2004Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). NNP04-NB/DA/MG 04-20661
11/19/2004Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. 04-21394
12/07/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 04-21130
12/07/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/15/2004Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC-MS/DA/RR/NB/WM/MG/MD 04-22864
12/20/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 8, 2004. 04-21130