Case Information: 97-AA-1999 | |||
Short Caption: | GREGORY K. MORRIS V. DC BD. OF MEDICINE | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Bd of Medicine (BMED) |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 12/30/1997 | |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/30/1997 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 01/27/1998 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 11/06/1998 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Petitioner | Gregory K. Morris | N |
| ||||||
Respondent | D.C. Board of Medicine | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/30/1997 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
12/30/1997 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |||
01/08/1998 | PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
01/13/1998 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Charles L. Reischel. | |||
01/27/1998 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
01/27/1998 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
03/20/1998 | ORDER: The brief_ of petitioner_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of respondent ___ ___________ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: JAC) | |||
04/23/1998 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 6/29/98 no oppo | |||
04/23/1998 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
05/01/1998 | ORDER: Grant the motion of petitioner for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the brief of petitioner shall be filed on or before June 29, 1998_____. (By: JAC) | |||
06/29/1998 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
08/03/1998 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 10/3/98 | |||
08/05/1998 | ORDER: Grant motion of respondent for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before October 5, 1998. (By: JAC) | |||
10/02/1998 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO REMAND | |||
10/08/1998 | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to resp mot to remand | |||
10/14/1998 | RESPONDENT'S REPLY -- to petitioner's opposition to motion to remand | |||
10/20/1998 | TMC - Respondent's motion to remand - Petitioner's opposition - Respondent's reply | |||
10/23/1998 | RECEIVED petitioner's opposition to reply of DC to opposition to motion for remand (needs a motionfor leave) | |||
10/29/1998 | PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OPPOSITION | |||
10/29/1998 | RECEIVED - pet. oppo to reply of aple's to oppo to mot for remand | |||
10/29/1998 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
11/05/1998 | ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION to file surreply. *** MORE *** | |||
11/05/1998 | ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION TO REMAND and this petition for review is hereby remanded to the agency for further proceedings consistent with those outlined in the motion to remand. F/O that respondent shall take the necessary steps to expedite the proceedings on remand. F/O that respondent shall fiel bi-monthly reports with this court on the status of the proceedings on remand. F/O that the Clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith. (by: FARDBE) | |||
11/05/1998 | REMANDED | |||
11/06/1998 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
01/05/1999 | RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to 11/5/98 order |