AMAR JIT SINGH V. VITEK

Case Information: 97-CV-0696
Short Caption:	AMAR JIT SINGH V. VITEK	Classification:	Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Lead:	97-CV-0591	Consolidated:	97-CV-0696
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	CA7793-96	Filed Date:	03/26/1997
Opening Event Date:	03/26/1997	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:		Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	12/12/1997

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
03/21/1997		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (No indication of ordering RT from ADS)
03/21/1997		$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
03/26/1997		NOTICE OF APPEAL
06/09/1997		ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 97-CV-591 and 97-CV-696 for all purposes herein. F/O tha these appeals are hereby stayed pending the resoltion of the lead cases, Eric T. et al., v. National Enterprise Medicall Inc., et al., no. 95-CV-1118. F/O that all parties shall notify this court within 15 days from the date of this order if there are any other cross appeals filed from civil action CA7793-96. If a party determines that a cross appeal in CA7793-96 has not been docketed by this court, that party shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, transmit a copy of a stamped notice of appeal to this court for processing. (BY: AMW) SW
06/09/1997		CASE STAYED
10/27/1997		ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. appellant_ shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, show cause why the stay should not be lifted and appeals. nos. 97-CV-591 and 97-CV-696__________________________ remanded to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Eric T., et al. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., et al., no. 95CV1118. (By: AMW)
11/10/1997		RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (appellant's)
11/12/1997		APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to order to show cause
11/20/1997		JUDGMENT: The stay in this case is hereby vacated. F/O that the conditional dismissals entered as to the cross-appellants are hereby vacated, and their cases remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Eric T., et al. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., no. 95-CV-1118 (D.C. August 21, 1997). On remand, the trial court shall determine whether it has personal jurisdiction over these defendants. In the event that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over any of these defendants, the complaint against that defendant shall be unconditionally dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. If the court determines that it has personal jurisdiction over one or more of these defendants, then the previously entered order dismissing the complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens shall be reinstated as to those defendants. F/O that as to all other parties, the orders on appeal are hereby affirmed. (FA, RD, GA) (By: GP)
11/20/1997		PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
11/20/1997		REMANDED
12/12/1997		MANDATE ISSUED