| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 07/09/1997 | | DISCIPLINARY LETTER from the Office of Bar Counselwith a certified copy of an order disbarring the respondent from the Court of Appeals of Maryland. | |
| 07/21/1997 | | ORDER It appearing that the Court has received a certified copy of an order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent, it is accordingly, pursuant to Rule XI, Sec 11 (d) of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel inform the Board on Professional Responsibility of his position regarding reciprocal discipline within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, respondent shall show cause before the Board on Professional Responsibility, if cause there be, within 10 days why identical, greater or lesser discipline should not be imposed in the District of Columbia. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Board on Professional Responsibility is directed to recommend promptly thereafter to this Court whether identical, greater or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline or whether the Board instead, elects to proceed de novo pursuant to Rule XI, Sec 11. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's atttention is drawn to the requirement of D.C. App. Rule XI, Sec 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Sec 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with Sec 14, including the filing of the required affidavit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall cause a copy of this order and the order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to be directed to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and transmitted to the respondent. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel advise the Court if the matter is concluded without the necessity of further court action. (AMW) | |
| 08/21/1997 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel advising thecourt that respondent has failed to file, with the Court of Appeals and the BPR, the affidavit required by Rule XI, SS 14(g). | |
| 09/10/1997 | | AFFIDAVIT of respondent in compliance with D.C. Rule XI. | |
| 07/02/1998 | | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. that in Dkt. No. 240-94 that respondent be disbarred. It is also recommended that Dkt. No. 293-97 be dismissed. | |
| 07/14/1998 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel taking no exceptions to the R&R. | |
| 07/21/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTIONS to the report and recommendation. | |
| 07/21/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of the exceptions of respondent filed in response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation filed on July 2, 1998, it is ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of Bar Counsel shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (GP) | |
| 09/03/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 09/03/1998 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 09/09/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's consent motion for an enlargement of time in which to file brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's brief shall be filed on or before October 5, 1998. (GP) | |
| 10/05/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to November 4, 1998 (no oppo). | |
| 10/05/1998 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrxb. | |
| 10/07/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's second consent motion for an enlargement of time in which to file brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's brief shall be filed on or before November 4, 1998. (GP) | |
| 11/05/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to December 4, 1998 (no oppo) | |
| 11/10/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's third consent motion for an enlargement of time in which to file brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's brief shall be filed on or before December 4, 1998. (AMW) | |
| 12/09/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of this Court's order of November 10, 1998, which granted respondent's third consent motion for an extension of time to December 4, 1998, in which to file brief, and it appearing that respondent's brief has not been lodged with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall file within 15 days from the date of this order respondent's brief, acconpanied by a motion for leave to file brief out of time, and this Court's $10 motion fee. Failure to comply may result in the scheduling of this appeal on the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility only. (GP) | |
| 12/10/1998 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to January 11, 1999 (no oppo). | |
| 12/14/1998 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's fourth consent motion for enlargement of time in which to file brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's brief shall be filed on or before January 11, 1999. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (AMW) | |
| 01/11/1999 | | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |
| 02/16/1999 | | PETITIONER'S BRIEF (Bar Counsel) | |
| 02/16/1999 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 02/19/1999 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 02/22/1999 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 03/12/1999 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file reply brief to and including April 12, 1999 (no oppo). | |
| 03/12/1999 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrmp | |
| 03/16/1999 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's consent motion for an enlargement of time in which to file reply brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's reply brief shall be filed on or before April 12, 1999. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (GP) | |
| 04/13/1999 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an enlargement of time in which to file reply brief. | |
| 04/15/1999 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's consent motion for an enlargement of time in which to file reply brief, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's reply brief shall be filed on or before May 13, 1999. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (GP) | |
| 05/20/1999 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file reply brief to and including June 3, 1999 (no oppo). | |
| 05/20/1999 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mrmp | |
| 08/05/1999 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 08/20/1999 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Office of Bar Counsel) | |
| 10/12/1999 | | ORDER On consideration of the motion of respondent for an enlargement of time in which to file reply brief, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file same, time having expired. It is ORDERED that respondent's motion is denied. (GP) | |
| 10/19/1999 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 10/19/1999 | | ARGUED (WG,TE,SC) Steven Polin, Esquire, for appellant. Ross T. Dicker, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 10/20/1999 | | ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that, no later than thirty days after the entry of this order, the Board on Professional Responsibility shall submit to the court its views as to whether the principles set forth in In re Kersey, 520 A.2d 321 (D.C. 1987) should be applied to cases of cocaine addiction in general and to this case in particular. Bar Counsel and counsel for respondent shall have twenty days to respond to the Board's submission. (By WA, TE, SC) | |
| 11/19/1999 | | PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to this court's order of October 20, 1999. | |
| 11/19/1999 | | RECEIVED - Brief of Amicus Curiae The Lawyer Counseling Committee | |
| 11/19/1999 | | AMICUS CURIAE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 12/07/1999 | | ORDER GRANTING AC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF, and the lodged amicus curiae brief is filed. (By: WG, TE & SC) | |
| 12/07/1999 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF | |
| 12/08/1999 | | LETTER from Bar Counsel taking no exception to the Board's supplemental report. | |
| 12/08/1999 | | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file a response to the amicus brief up to and including January 10, 1999. | |
| 12/09/1999 | | error | |
| 12/13/1999 | | ORDER GRANT PTNR MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION, and Bar Counsel may file a response to the amicus curiae brief no later than January 10, 2000. (By: WA, TE & SC) | |
| 12/16/1999 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an enlargement of time to file a response to the Board's response to this court's order of October 20, 1999. | |
| 12/27/1999 | | ORDERED that the motion is granted, and respondent may file a response to the petitioner's answer response to this court's order of October 20, 1999, no later than January 15, 2000. (By: WA, TE & SC) | |
| 01/10/2000 | | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF (BAR COUNSEL) TO BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE OF LAWYER COUNSELING COMMITTEE | |
| 01/19/2000 | | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF in response to the brief filed by the Board on Professional Responsibility. | |
| 01/28/2000 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE BRIEF,and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before February 2, 2000. | |
| 02/07/2000 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file a response to the petitioner's response to this court's October 20, 1999 order. | |
| 02/15/2000 | | On consideration of respondent's unopposed motion for an enlargement of time to file his brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before February 22, 2000. (By: WA, TE & SC) | |
| 03/08/2000 | | On further consideration of this Court's order of February 15, 2000, which granted respondent's unopposed motion for an enlargement of time up to and including February 22, 2000, to file a response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's views as to whether the principles set forth in In re Kersey, 520 A.2d 321 (D.C. 1987) should be applied to cases of cocaine addition in general and to this case in particular, per this Court's October 20, 1999, order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file his response, and it further appearing that respondent has requested and has been granted three continuances to file a response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's brief, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 days from the date of this order file his response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's brief. Failure to comply with this order will result in the Court considering the responses of the Board on Professional Responsibility and Bar Counsel to this Court's October 20, 1999, order only. No further continuance requests will be entertained by this court. (BY: WA, TE & SC) | |
| 03/21/2000 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to late file brief. | |
| 03/21/2000 | | RECEIVED respondent's lodged brief. | |
| 03/24/2000 | | ORDER GRANT RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION, and the lodged response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's brief is filed. (WA,TE & SC) | |
| 03/24/2000 | | RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM ( response to the Board on Professional Responsibility's brief.) | |
| 11/22/2000 | | DISBARMENT We adopt the Board's recommendation that Marshall be disbarred. (By *WA, TE, SC) *Dissenting opinion by WA. | |
| 12/08/2000 | | RESP MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB (No opposition) | |
| 12/11/2000 | | NOTICE RECEIVED from Bar Counsel that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by Rule XI, Sec 14 (g). | |
| 12/14/2000 | | ORDER On consideration of the consent motion of respondent for an enlargement of time within which to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc shall be filed on or about January 8, 2001. (AMW) | |
| 01/10/2001 | | RESP MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB (No opposition) Second request. | |
| 01/22/2001 | | ORDER On consideration of the consent motion of respondent for an enlargement of time within which to file a petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and respondent's petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc shall be filed on or before January 25, 2001. (AMW) | |
| 01/29/2001 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for an enlargement of time in which to file petition for rehearing. | |
| 02/05/2001 | | LETTER Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the US District Court for the District of Columbia suspending respondent. | |
| 02/05/2001 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to respondent's motion for an enlargement of time in which to file petition for reh/reh en banc. | |
| 02/14/2001 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's motion for an enlargement of time within which to file a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, which motion requested an extension up to and including February 5, 2001, Bar Counsel's opposition, and it appearing that respondent has failed to lodge the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc with the court, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is denied. (AMW) | |
| 02/16/2001 | | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for reconsideration of the denial for an enlargement of time in which to file a petition for rehearing, rehearing en banc, or in the alternative for leave to late file the petition. | |
| 02/16/2001 | | RECEIVED respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. | |
| 02/16/2001 | | AMICUS CURIAE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION of the Lawyers Counseling Committee to file brief in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. | |
| 02/16/2001 | | RECEIVED brief of Amicus Curiae | |
| 02/26/2001 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION (Bar Counsel) to respondent's motion for reconsideration of order denying motion for enlargement of time in which to file petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc. | |
| 03/14/2001 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's motion for reconsideration of this court's order of February 14, 2001, denying respondent's third motion for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and on consideration of the motion of the Lawyer's Counseling Committee of the District of Columbia Bar, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the lodged brief of amicus curiae, and it appearing that respondent has cited exceptional circumstances for the need for extensions of time to file the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and it further appearing that respondent has lodged with the court his petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and that the Lawyer Counseling Committee has lodged its brief in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion for reconsideration is granted and the Clerk is directed to file respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Lawyer Counseling Committee's motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file that Committee's brief as amicus curiae in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. (AMW) | |
| 03/14/2001 | | RESP'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 03/14/2001 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. | |
| 03/20/2001 | | ORDER It appearing that the respondent has filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that the petitioner, within 20 days from the date of this order, shall file a response (ten copies) thereto. (AMW) | |
| 04/05/2001 | | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for enlargement of time in which to file response to respondent's petition for rehearing and or rehearing en banc. (No opposition) | |
| 04/11/2001 | | ORDER On consideration of Bar Counsel's consent motion for an enlargement of time within which to file a response to respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, which motion requested an extension up to and including May 9, 2001, it is ORDERED that Bar Counsel's motion is granted and Bar Counsel's response shall be filed on or before May 9, 2001. (AMW) | |
| 05/09/2001 | | PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION to respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. | |
| 10/26/2001 | | ORDER On consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the Lawyers Counseling Committee brief Amicus Curiae in support of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. (By WA, TE, SC) *Chief Judge Wagner would grant petition for rehearing. | |
| 10/26/2001 | | ORDER DENYING RESP PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (By *WA, *TE, ST, *SC, FA, RZ, RD, GL, WH) *Chief Judge Wagner, Associate Judges Ruiz, Reid and Washington, would grant rehearing en banc. | |
| 01/16/2002 | | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia disbarring respondent, based on his November 22, 2000, disbarment by this court. | |