judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

IN RE: FRANCISCO LAGUNA

Case Information: 97-BG-1454
Short Caption:IN RE: FRANCISCO LAGUNAClassification:Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:BDN105-96Filed Date:09/03/1997

Opening Event Date:09/03/1997Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:08/25/1999
Argued/Submitted:04/11/2000
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerBar CounselN
Michael S. Frisch NN
Joyce E. Peters NN
PetitionerBoard on Professional ResponsibilityN
Patricia A. Brannan NN
RespondentFrancisco A. Laguna NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/03/1997DISCIPLINARY LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of the entry of a guilty plea, from the USDC for the Southern District of Florida, for the above-named attorney.
09/22/1997ORDER On consideration of the Certified copy of the quilty plea of respondent in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. it is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule XI, Sec 10 (c) of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, that respondent, Francisco Laguna, is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and the Board on Professional Responsibility is directed to institute a formal proceeding for determination of the nature of the final discipline to be imposed, and specifically to review the elements of the offenses for the purpose of determining whether or not the crimes involve moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C. Code Sec 11-2503 (a). Respondent's attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Sec 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with Sec 14, including the filing of the required affidavit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel inform the Court if the matter is resolved without the necessity of further court action. (AMW)
09/22/1997AFFIDAVIT of respondent filed per order of October 23, 1997.
10/09/1997AFFIDAVIT of respondent.
10/10/1997LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel stating that they do not oppose the imposition of sanctionnunc pro tunc to September 22, 1997, the date of respondent's interim suspension in this jurisdic- tion.
10/14/1997RESPONDENT'S BRIEF construed as respondent's motion for the imposition of sanction nunc pro tunc to April 20, 1995, the date of respondent's guilty plea in the Southern District of Florida.
10/23/1997ORDER On consideration of respondent's affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, Sec 14 (g), respondent's brief contrued as respondent's motion for the imposition of sanction nunc pro tunc to April 20, 1995, the date of respondent's guilty plea in the Southern District of Florida, and the letter from Bar Counsel stating that Bar Counsel does not oppose the imposition of sanction nunc pro tunc to September 22, 1997, the date of respondent's interim suspension in this jurisdiction, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted to the extent that the Clerk shall file respondent's affidavit nunc pro tunc to September 22, 1997, the date of his interim suspension in this jurisdiction. (SC,RD,NW)
12/24/1997REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. that when a judgment of conviction is entered in respondent's criminal case (as to which we will promptly notify the Court), an order of disbarment should be entered nunc pro tunc to April 20, 1995.
01/07/1998LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel taking no exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of the BPR.
01/26/1998LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel regarding the Board's report in this matter.
02/05/1998ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER MOTION FOR STAY On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility dated December 24, 1997, recommending that respondent be disbarred based on his plea of guilty to a crime of moral turpitude, and it appearing that respondent has not been sentenced on his plea, and the letter from Bar Counsel taking no exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and there appearing to be no opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that this matter is stayed pending Bar Counsel notifying this Court promptly of respondent's criminal conviction. It is FURHTER ORDERED that Bar Counsel advise the Court if the matter is concluded without the necessity of further court action. (By FA, RD, GA)
08/17/1999LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of the judgment of criminal conviction entered against Respondent in the United Staes District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 12, 1999.
08/25/1999ORDER On further consideration of this Court's order of February 5, 1998, which stayed this matter pending the judgment of conviction in respondent's criminal case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and the August 17, 1999, letter from Bar Counsel along with a certified copy of the July 12, 1999, judgment of conviction of respondent's criminal case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on February 5, 1998, is hereby vacated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to schedule this matter for consideration by a merits division of this court as soon as the calendar permits. (FA, RD, GA)
08/25/1999PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
08/25/1999BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/30/1999FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
02/25/2000CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
04/11/2000SUBMITTED (TE,ST,MK)
04/27/2000DISBARMENT Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent Francisco A. Laguna be, and he hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to April 20, 1995. (By TE, ST, MK)
02/27/2001RECEIVED from Bar Counsel a letter with a certified copy of an order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoking thelicense of respondent.