judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KEITH ROGERS V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 96-CO-0865
Short Caption:KEITH ROGERS V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief
Lead: 92-CF-0678 Consolidated: 94-CO-1120 , 96-CO-0865
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F9067-91Filed Date:05/22/1996

Opening Event Date:05/22/1996Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/20/1997Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/23/1998
Argued/Submitted:12/15/1998
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/27/1999

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKeith Rogers N
Mark J. Rochon NN
Jonathan L. Stern YN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN
Jonathan Rosen YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
05/22/1996NOTICE OF APPEAL
07/25/1996RECORD ON APPEAL
08/16/1996ORDER: Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, tender the $50 docketing fee and file the docketing statement with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the document out of time, and this court's $10 motion fee. The motion should set forth good cause for the fialure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. Appr. R. 14. (By GP)
10/30/1996ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on September 29, 1995, in appeal nos. 92-CF-678, 92-CF-744, and 94-CO-1120, is hereby vacated. It is F/O, sua sponte, that appeal no. 96-CO-865 is consolidated with appeal nos. 92-CF-678, 92-CF-744, and 94-CO-1120 for all purposes herein. It is F/O that appellant, in appeal no. 96-CO-865, shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, tender the $50 docketing fee and file the docketing statement with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the document out of time, and this court's $10 motion fee. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW)
10/30/1996error (h.jones) (vvd)
11/14/1996APPELLANT'S MOTION to late file docketing statement, Designation of Record and Statement Regarding Transcripts.
11/14/1996MOTION(S) FEE PAID
11/14/1996RECEIVED Appellant's Docketing Statement.
11/14/1996$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
11/14/1996RECEIVED Designation of Record.
11/14/1996RECEIVED Statement Regarding Transcript.
12/18/1996ORDER: Grant motion of appellant Keith Rogers to file the lodged docketing statement, designation of record and statement regarding transcript of appellant Keith Rogres. (By: GP)
12/18/1996APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (Keith Rogers)
12/18/1996DESIGNATION OF RECORD (Keith Rogers)
12/18/1996STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (Keith Rogers)
07/17/1997ORDERED that the record on appeal in appeal no. 94-CO-1120 is filed. It is F/O that in appeal no. 94-CO-1120 appellant shall make arrangements to have the transcript prepared and certified to this court within 10 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply shall subject appeal no. 94-CO-1120 to dismissal without further notice. It is F/O that the brief of appellants shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY: GPJ)
07/17/1997RECORD ON APPEAL (94-CO-1120)
08/20/1997APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 90 days. (for Keith Rogers)
08/20/1997MOTION(S) FEE PAID
09/02/1997ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellant Keith Rogers shall be filed on or before November 18, 1997. It is F/O that appellant Amos A. Irving shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timelyfile the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (BY: GPJ)
09/09/1997SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (163-pgs/tremel 3/11/96 proc.)
09/22/1997SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (25 pgs/Allison) 4/29/97 proc.
10/20/1997SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (26-pgs/tremel 3/15/96 proc.)
10/20/1997RECORD COMPLETED
11/18/1997APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (Keith Roger) for 30 days
11/18/1997MOTION(S) FEE PAID
12/15/1997ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeal no. 92-CF-744 is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 14. It is F/O that the motion of appellant Keith Rogers is granted, and the brief of appellant Keith Rogers shall be filed on or before December 18, 1997. (BY: AMW)
12/18/1997APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days
12/18/1997MOTION(S) FEE PAID
01/07/1998ORDER: Grant the motion of appellant for an extension of time, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before January 20, 1998. No further requests for for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this order shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW)
01/23/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
01/23/1998MOTION(S) FEE PAID
01/23/1998RECEIVED - aplt's brief
02/10/1998ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the brief of appellant. It is F/ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before February 23, 1998. (By: AMW)
02/10/1998APPELLANT'S BRIEF
02/10/1998error
02/23/1998APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 3/24/98
03/12/1998ORDER: Grant the motion of appellee for an extension of time, and the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before March 25, 1998. (By: GP)
03/24/1998APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 4/15/98
04/15/1998RECEIVED - aple's brief
04/22/1998ORDER: Grant the motion of appellant for an extension of time, and the lodged brief. ORDERED that the lodged brief of appellant is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before May 20, 1998. (By: GP)
04/22/1998APPELLANT'S BRIEF
06/02/1998ORDER: Appellee shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled on the record on appeal and appellant's brief without further notice. (By: GP)
06/23/1998ORDER: ORDERED, ss, that the court's orders of April 22, 1998 and June 2, 1998 are hereby vacated. FO that the motion of appellee to extend time to file the brief is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellee. FO that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (By: AMW)
06/23/1998APPELLEE'S BRIEF
06/23/1998BRIEFS COMPLETED
07/08/1998FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
07/09/1998LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
08/12/1998LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
10/29/1998CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
12/04/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF no ppo
12/04/1998RECEIVED
12/04/1998RECEIVED -aplt's reply brief
12/04/1998MOTION(S) FEE PAID
12/10/1998ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE REPLY BRIEF and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply brief. (GP)
12/10/1998APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED
12/15/1998ARGUED (WG,ST,SC) Jonathan L. STern, Esquire, for appellant. Jonathan Rosen, Esquire, for appellee.
01/05/1999AFFIRMED MOJ (WG,ST,SC)
01/27/1999MANDATE ISSUED
11/09/2011FiledMotion To Recall The Mandate (Appellant)Denied
11/10/2011FiledTMC/MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE
11/18/2011FiledORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE
12/07/2011FiledMotion To Reconsider Order Denying Motion to Recall the Mandate. (Appellant)
12/09/2011FiledTMC//MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO RECALL
12/19/2011FiledOrder Denying motion to reconsider denial of motion to recall mandate and to supplement motion to recall mandate