Case Information: 97-AA-1816 | |||
Short Caption: | JOHN BURKE V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DIR.DKT. 89-74 | Filed Date: | 11/21/1997 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/21/1997 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 12/28/2000 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 05/15/2001 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | John Burke | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp. | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/18/1997 | PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
11/21/1997 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
11/21/1997 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & Michael A. Milwee | |||
09/26/2000 | It appearing that the petition for review was served on November 21, 1997________, and the administrative record was due to be filed with this court on January 7, 1998___________ (See D.C. App. R. 17), and has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the administrative record, accompanied by a motion for leave to late file the record out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the record or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (By: GP) | |||
10/17/2000 | RESP MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE RECORD | |||
11/20/2000 | ORD GRT RESP MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE RECORD to the extent that respondent shall,w/in 15 days, file the record on appeal. (by: GP) sw | |||
12/15/2000 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE RECORD | |||
12/15/2000 | RECEIVED - Record | |||
12/28/2000 | On consideration of the motion of respondent for leave to late file the administrative record, time having expired, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the lodged administrative record is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief_ of petitioner_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of respondent_ and ___________ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP_) sw | |||
12/28/2000 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
12/28/2000 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
12/28/2000 | error | |||
02/07/2001 | PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF no oppo | |||
02/07/2001 | RECEIVED-petitioner's brief on appeal | |||
02/07/2001 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
02/13/2001 | RECEIVED - statement in lieu of brief | |||
02/26/2001 | ORDER GRANTING PTNR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEFand the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of petitioner. F/O that respondent shall, w/in 20 days, show cause why the statement in lieu of brief should not be stricken and the District directed to file a brief. See Surgent v. DC, 683 A.2d 493,496 no.2(D.C. 1996). (AMW) sw | |||
02/26/2001 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
03/08/2001 | ORDERED,ss, that this court's order of Feb. 26, 2001, is hereby amended to the extent that it reflects the correct respondent in this case. F/O that respondent shall, w/in 20 days, show cause why the statement in lieu of brief should not be stricken and the District directed to file a brief. See Surgent v. DC, 683 A.2d 493, 496 no.2(D.C. 1996). sw | |||
03/16/2001 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
04/05/2001 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO REMAND | |||
04/13/2001 | STATEMENT - from petitioner of non representation | |||
04/23/2001 | ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION TO REMAND and this case is hereby remanded to the agency for further administrative proceedings consistent with respondent's motion. (AMW) sw | |||
04/23/2001 | REMANDED | |||
05/15/2001 | MANDATE ISSUED |