Case Information: 10-AA-1254 | |||
Short Caption: | REGINALD W. OSBORN V. WACKENHUT SERVICES INC. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DOES1739-10 | Filed Date: | 10/12/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 10/12/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
Record Completed: | 01/28/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 06/13/2011 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 11/09/2011 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 12/23/2011 |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Petitioner | Reginald W. Osborn | N | Pro Se | N | |
Respondent | Wackenhut Services Inc. | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
10/12/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc) | |||
10/12/2010 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
10/26/2010 | ORDER DENY PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and petitioner is hereby directed to tender the $100 fee within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this petition for review. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is F/O that the lodged petition for review is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of thiscourt. (ETW) | |||
11/03/2010 | FILING FEE | |||
11/18/2010 | ORDERED that the lodged petitionf or review is filed nunc pro tunc to October 12, 2010. It is F/O that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (JAC) | |||
11/18/2010 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE | |||
12/27/2010 | On consideration of this court's order of November 18, 2010, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (JAC) | |||
01/28/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL w/ 8/27/10 hearing | |||
01/28/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
02/02/2011 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (JAC) | |||
03/08/2011 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF w/ appendix attached | |||
03/08/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
05/05/2011 | It appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on March 8, 2011, and the brief of respondent was due to be filed on or before April 12, 2011, but the brief has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (JAC) | |||
06/13/2011 | On consideration of this court's order of November 18, 2010, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that respondent's brief was due to be filed on or before May 25, 2011, but the brief has not been filed with this court, ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration on the record and on the petitioner's brief alone. (ETW) | |||
06/13/2011 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
06/23/2011 | Filed | Final Screening-Summary | ||
10/04/2011 | Filed | ACTION - Calendar notice sent | ||
11/09/2011 | Filed | Submitted to Judges Wagner, King, Nebeker | ||
11/30/2011 | Filed | Affirmed (MOJ) (Wagner, Nebeker and King, Senior Judge.) | ||
12/23/2011 | Filed | Mandate |