| Case Information: 10-CT-1271 | |||
| Short Caption: | DAVID PEEBLES V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal - DC - Traffic |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CTF12722-10 | Filed Date: | 10/08/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 10/08/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 12/02/2010 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 03/31/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | David Peebles | Y |
| ||||||
| Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 10/08/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 10/26/2010 | On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that Edward Schwab, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the statement regarding transcript available for completion online. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (By: JAC) | |||
| 10/26/2010 | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Edward Schwab, Esquire | |||
| 11/03/2010 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (rt ordered/needed)dfe | |||
| 12/02/2010 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (94pgs/Tape) 10/4/10 proc. w/CD | |||
| 12/02/2010 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 12/07/2010 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (Castillo) | |||
| 12/07/2010 | RECORD INDEX | |||
| 12/07/2010 | RECORD COPIES | |||
| 01/18/2011 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to January 25, 2011 (no oppo). | |||
| 01/26/2011 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (TO SUSPEND BRIEFING) LW | |||
| 02/07/2011 | ORDERED that APPELLANT shall W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for LACK OF JURISDICTION as an associate judge's review of a magistrate judge's decision is a prerequisite for appeal. See DC CODE 11-1732(k) (2010 Supp). It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 02/07/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO SUSPEND BRIEFING ARE DENIED. (BY: ETW) LW | |||
| 02/07/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
| 02/28/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - dated 2/7/11 | |||
| 03/10/2011 | ORDERED that this APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. SEE DC CODE 11-1732 (K)(2001). (GLPRFE) (rm) | |||
| 03/10/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 03/31/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||