| Case Information: 10-SP-1612 | |||
| Short Caption: | IN RE: ACCESS TO JURY QUESTIONNAIRE; WASHINGTON POST, APLT | Classification: | Appeals - Special Proceedings - Other Special Proceedings |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CF1-9230-09 | Filed Date: | 12/23/2010 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 12/23/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
| Record Completed: | 01/11/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 03/29/2011 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 09/20/2011 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 03/15/2012 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Allbritton Communications Company | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Alm Media LLC | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | American Society of News Editors | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Associated Press | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Atlantic Media Incorporated | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Dow Jones and Company Incorporated | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Gannett Company Incorporated | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Hearst Corporation | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | National Public Radio | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | New York Times Company | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | The New Yorker | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Newspaper Association of America | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Radio Television Digital News Association | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Society of Professional Journalists | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Amicus-Appellant | Tribune Company | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Appellant | Washington Post Newspaper (the) | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Appellee | United States | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Appellee | Ingmar Guandique | Y |
| ||||||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 12/23/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 01/11/2011 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (25-pgs/tape maar 11/24/10 proc.)w/cd | |||
| 01/11/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 01/13/2011 | ORDERED: That James W. Klein, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant Ingmar Guandique in this appeal. It is (more) | |||
| 01/13/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: JAC) | |||
| 01/26/2011 | RECORD INDEX | |||
| 02/22/2011 | Filed | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | ||
| 02/22/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
| 03/01/2011 | Filed | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF | ||
| 03/29/2011 | Filed | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | ||
| 03/29/2011 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 03/31/2011 | MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF aple/Guandique | |||
| 04/08/2011 | Filed | Final Screening - Regular | ||
| 04/26/2011 | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |||
| 06/21/2011 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the month(s) of Sept 2011 through Nov 2011, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by July 15, 2011, of specific dates du ring that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. (Please see the attached instruction sheet.) (aj) Julio Castillo Clerk | |||
| 06/27/2011 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |||
| 08/10/2011 | Filed | Letter From Counsel/Party Re Future Calendaring (Washington Post) (Appellant) | ||
| 08/11/2011 | Filed | Order Sua Sponte, that scheduled for consideration on the Regular Calendar of September 20, 2011, at 9:30am | ||
| 08/11/2011 | Filed | Calendar notice sent | ||
| 09/20/2011 | Filed | Argued Before Glickman,Oberly,King Bruce D.Brown Esq., for appellant Patrica A.Hefferman Esq.,for APPELLEE | ||
| 01/19/2012 | Filed | Reversed And Remanded (OPINION) (Glickman and Oberly, Associate Judges, and King, Senior Judge.) (ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment on appeal is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.) | ||
| 03/15/2012 | Filed | Mandate | ||