| Case Information: 11-AA-0257 | |||
| Short Caption: | MICHAEL SINDRAM V. D.C. DEP'T OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Other agency |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | DHCF00099-10 | Filed Date: | 03/04/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 03/04/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Michael Sindram | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Respondent | District of Columbia Dep't of Health Care Finance | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 03/04/2011 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECVD ONLY). | |||
| 03/04/2011 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 03/17/2011 | ORDERED that PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IFP IS DENIED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
| 03/17/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that PETITIONER shall W/N 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be STRICKEN AND DISMISSED either for failure to tender the court's $100 filing fee, see D.C. App. R. 3 (e); OR for FAILURE TO COMPLY with this court's previous orders. See DC App. R. 13. (BY: ETW) | |||
| 03/17/2011 | TMC - (LODGED) PFR - OTSC - (LODGED) ROTSC | |||
| 04/07/2011 | RECEIVED Petitioner's Response to OTSC. | |||
| 05/12/2011 | ORDERED that this PFR IS DISMISSED for failure to tender the $100 filing fee as petitioner has been barred by this court from proceeding IFP. It is FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is reminded of the requirements outlined in this court's previous order of July 7, 1994 in apeal 87-CV1284 which precluded petitioner from proceeding IFP and...SEE HARDCOPY It is FURTHER ORDERED that THAT THIS COURT SHALL NOT ACCEPT (1) ANY FUTURE APPEAL/PFR filed by petitioner/appellant unless petitioner/appellant first provides proper proof of payment of the requisite filing fee for noting the appeal or (2) ...SEE HARDCOPY (FITEST) | |||
| 05/12/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 05/23/2011 | RECEIVED - PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (returned to Petitioner by mail IAW D.C.C.A. Order dated May 12, 2011) | |||
| 05/27/2011 | RECEIVED from pro se Petitioner the returned Petition for Rehearing - no action required pursuant to DCCA Order dated 5/12/11 re: proof of payment | |||