Case Information: 10-CV-1367 | |||
Short Caption: | JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY V. RICKY RICARDO YOUNG, ET AL | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Property |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAR4515-10 | Filed Date: | 10/22/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 10/22/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 01/28/2011 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Jeffrey M. Young-Bey | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | Ricky Ricardo Young | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
10/22/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
11/22/2010 | ORDERED that APPELLANT shall W/N 20 DAYS from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-EXISTENT ORDER OR for having been taken from a NON-APPEALBLE ORDER. See DC code 11-721 (2001). (BY: ETW) | |||
11/22/2010 | TMC - OTSC | |||
01/06/2011 | ORDERED that this APPEAL IS DISMISSED as having been taken from a NON-APPEALABLE ORDER. See DC Code 11-721 (2001). (RZTEFA) (cb) | |||
01/06/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
01/28/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED |