Case Information: 10-DA-0022 | |||
Short Caption: | NICHOLAS KRAUT V. JAMES H. VANCE | Classification: | Discretionary - Discretionary - Small Claims |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | SC3-009012-09 | Filed Date: | 11/08/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/08/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Petitioner | Nicholas Kraut | N | Pro Se | N | |
Respondent | James H. Vance | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/08/2010 | APPLICATION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL | Denied | ||
11/08/2010 | FILING FEE of $10.00. | |||
11/09/2010 | TMC - application for allowance of appeal | |||
12/16/2010 | ORDERED taht the AAA IS HEREBY DENIED... (this court will grant an AAA only where the applicant demonstrates apparent error or a question of law, which has not been but should be decided by this Court)... (THOBFA) (cb) | |||
12/28/2010 | PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED AS PETTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC LW | |||
01/04/2011 | TMC - motion for reconsideration | |||
01/21/2011 | ORDERED that the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED as applicant provide no new basis to reconsider the denial of his AAA. See Karath v. Generalis, 277 A.2d 650, 651 (DC 1971). (THOBFA) (cb) |