judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

KARL VS. KARL

Case Information: 38596
Short Caption:KARL VS. KARLCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D267078Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:10/16/2001 / Pomrenze, SandraSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:09/06/2002 at 11:00 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:09/06/2002How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/10/2001Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Jolley Urga Wirth & Woodbury--check no. 521536.
10/10/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-17058
10/16/2001Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Sandra Pomrenze. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
10/29/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 01-18026
11/09/2001Notice/Outgoing Letter. Sandra Pomrenze.
12/17/2001Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 01-21225
01/08/2002Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. This court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a). Because this is a child custody matter, appellant shall have 90 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Respondent shall have 20 days after service of the opening brief to file and serve the answering brief. Appellant shall have 10 days after service of the answering brief to file and serve the reply brief. NRAP 31(a)(2). 02-00455
01/15/2002Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 4/5/01 and 8/20/01. To Court Reporter: Deborah S. Casper. 02-01012
03/04/2002MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 02-03900
03/08/2002Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed March 4, 2002. Ms. Ajoub shall file and serve the requested transcripts by March 29, 2002. fn1[All future motions for extensions of time must be accompanied by a proof of service on all parties to the appeal.] 02-04262
03/22/2002TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: 4/5/01 and 8/20/01. Court Reporter: Shelly Ajoub and Alice Eastgate. 02-05170
04/09/2002BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 04/08/02. Signed by: Kathryn Stryker Wirth. 02-06270
04/09/2002AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-06271
05/02/2002MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (Child Custody) 02-07725
05/03/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed May 2, 2002. Respondent shall file and serve the answering brief by May 30, 2002. No further extensions of time shall be permitted absent demonstration of extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. 02-07811
05/06/2002MotionFiled Response to Motion. Appellant's Opposition to Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief and Countermotion for an Order Reversing the Decision of the District Court without Further Consideration. 02-07870
06/03/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 05/30/02. 02-09622
06/10/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. fn1[The answering brief was received on June 6, 2002. Because the brief was mailed to the clerk on May 30, 2002, the brief was timely submitted and was therefore filed.]We elect to treat appellant's opposition filed on May 6, 2002 as a motion for reconsideration of our May 3, 2002, order granting respondent an extension of time to file the answering brief, and we deny the motion. In her counter-motion, appellant asserts that respondent's failure to file the answering brief timely should be treated as a confession of error. Because we prefer to decide appeals on their merits, we deny appellant's counter-motion. 02-10096
06/13/2002BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 06/12/02. 02-10254
08/14/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on September 6, 2002, at 11:00 a.m. (En Banc)
08/27/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
09/06/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the Court En Banc. EN BANC
10/29/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." En Banc-Maupin, C.J., Young, Shearing, Agosti, Leavitt, and Becker, JJ. Rose, J., dissenting. 02-18632
11/26/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-18936
11/26/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/20/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 3, 2002. 02-18936