Case Information: 10-CV-1489 | |||
Short Caption: | DAVID CRUM V. HARCO, INC. | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB6174-10 | Filed Date: | 11/29/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/29/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 01/21/2011 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | |||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | David Crum | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | Harco Inc. | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/29/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
12/14/2010 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 29, 2010_, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, file with the Court Reporting Division a motion for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, with notice to appellee(s), for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10(b)(5)(A). The Court Reporting Division will submit the motion to the appropriate judge for a decision as to whether transcripts will be provided at no cost. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file-stamped copy of that motion with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (JAC) elp | |||
12/21/2010 | RECEIVED - motion for appeal transcript (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 11/19/10) (elp) | |||
01/11/2011 | APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD w/ documents attached | |||
01/11/2011 | RECEIVED- aplt's docuements to be supplemented | |||
01/13/2011 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (22-pgs/tape 11/19/10 proc.)w/cd | |||
01/21/2011 | RECORD INDEX | |||
01/21/2011 | RECORD COPIES | |||
01/21/2011 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
02/03/2011 | On consideration of appellant's motion to supplement the record, and it appearing that appellant seeks to supplement the record on appeal with documents that were not part of the record in the underlying matter in the trial court, and it further appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record is denied. See D.C. App. R. 10 (a); Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., 453 A.2d 110, 112 (D.C. 1982). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (ETW) elp | |||
03/09/2011 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF appendix attached | |||
03/09/2011 | APPENDIX | |||
04/18/2011 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |||
04/20/2011 | TMC - motion for summary affirmance | |||
07/01/2011 | JMT GRANT APPELLEE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE ...SEE HARDCOPY It is ***MORE*** | |||
07/01/2011 | AFFIRMED (GLRDTE) |