Case Information: 29815 | |||
Short Caption: | FONSECA (FIDEL) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
Related Case(s): | 29551 , 39279 , 41207 , 42591 , 43905 , 48587 | ||
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C133562 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Life - Direct |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | 02/05/1998 | How Submitted: | |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
01/09/1997 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. Criminal. | ||
01/09/1997 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | ||
01/23/1997 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice. To File Case Appeal Statement. Due Date: 10 days. | ||
02/04/1997 | Docketing Statement | Received Docketing Statement. | ||
02/13/1997 | Motion | Filed Motion. To Extend Time/Docketing Statement. | ||
02/21/1997 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Extending Time/Docketing Statement. The clerk shall file the docketing statement provisionally on February 4, 1997, forthwith. | ||
02/21/1997 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | ||
02/21/1997 | Other | Other. Returned, unfiled, Case Appeal Statement. (Not filed or certified by district court clerk.) | ||
02/27/1997 | Other | Other. Received Certified Case Appeal Statement. Filed in the district court on February 25, 1997. | ||
05/02/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Opening Brief. (Mailed on: 4/30/97.) | ||
05/22/1997 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file the appendix and, if necessary, a transcript request form. Failure to timely and properly comply with this order and this court's procedural rules may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel. | ||
05/23/1997 | Motion | Filed Motion. To Consolidate, Motion to Strike Arguments B-F from Appellant Fonseca's Opening Brief and Motion to Hold Briefing Schedules in Abeyance. (Nos. 29551 and 29815). | ||
06/04/1997 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion to Strike and Hold Briefing Schedule in Abeyance. Nos. 29551 and 29815. | ||
07/10/1997 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. We deny respondent's motion to consolidate these appeals (Nos. 29551 and 29815). We deny respondent's motion to strike certain arguments in appellant Fonseca's opening brief without prejudice to respondent's right to respond to the arguments in its answering brief. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an answering brief in Docket No. 29551 and an answering brief in docket no. 29815. (Nos. 29551 and 29815). | ||
08/11/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Respondent's Answering Brief (no postmark). | ||
08/29/1997 | Brief | Filed Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief. (Mailed on: 8/27/97.) | ||
09/08/1997 | Other | Other. Filed Certified of Compliance. | ||
02/05/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein. | ||
02/05/1998 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
01/11/1999 | Letter/Incoming | Received Letter. From Marquis & Aurbach re: remittiturs in these matters. Nos. 28275, 29815, 27988. | ||
03/31/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, serve and file an appendix to the opening brief. We waive the requirement that appellant file a certificate of no transcript request pursuant to NRAP 9(a). Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel for appellant. | ||
04/14/1999 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Appellant's Appendix. | ||
10/02/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. Having considered appellant's claims and concluded that they lack merit or are not appropriate for review on direct appeal, " . . . we affirm the judgment of the district court." SNP00A-CY/WM/NB | 00-17339 | |
10/31/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 00-17448 | |
10/31/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
12/04/2000 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 13, 2000. | 00-17448 |