| Case Information: 32284 | |||
| Short Caption: | PARHAM (MERVYN) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C133502 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 11/02/1998 | How Submitted: | |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 05/04/1998 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | 00-09005 | |
| 05/04/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | ||
| 07/09/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Re: Records on Appeal. Within 120 days from the date of this order the clerk of the district court shall transmit to this court a certifited copy of the complete trial court record in each of the above-identified appeals, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings. 1[The records shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] Nos. 32252, 32271, 32273, 32275, 32284, 32305, 32312, 32315. | ||
| 11/02/1998 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. | ||
| 11/02/1998 | Other | Other. Case submitted on the Record on Appeal this day. | ||
| 11/02/1998 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 05/09/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. The clerk of the district court shall have 20 days from the date of this order to transmit to the clerk of this court, as a supplemental record on appeal, a certified copy of the presentence investigation report. | ||
| 06/05/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal Copy. Volume 2 (SEALED). | ||
| 06/13/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Because the record before this court does not support the district court's ruling, the State shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be remanded to the district court for reconsideration of appellant's motion as a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and for the resolution of appellant's claims on the merits. | 01-09905 | |
| 07/17/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 01-12109 | |
| 12/18/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order of Reversal and Remand. We conclude that oral argument and briefing are unwarranted in this matter. "ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED and REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order." fn5[Although the record before this court does not show whether any good time credits have been applied to appellant's sentence, it appears that appellant might have expired his sentence if such credits were earned and applied. If so, we note for the benefit of the district court that the issue presented may have been rendered moot.] NNP02-MS/RR/NB | 01-21266 | |
| 01/15/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-00562 | |
| 01/15/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 02/01/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 17, 2002. | 02-00562 | |