judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ZAMBRANO (JULIO) VS. WARDEN

Case Information: 34373
Short Caption:ZAMBRANO (JULIO) VS. WARDENCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 35438
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR97P1771Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:01/11/2000How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
06/22/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
06/22/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) 99-05412
06/25/1999TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: April 16, 1999. Court Reporter: Kristine Bokelmann. 99-05599
06/30/1999Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Filed certified copy of order filed in district court on 6/22/99 appointing Karla K. Butko as counsel for appellant. 99-05727
07/16/1999Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. 99-06377
07/16/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Fast Track Statement. 99-06378
07/22/1999Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Response. 99-06605
10/12/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Full Briefing. We have determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. Opening brief and appendix due: 40 days. fn[We suspend the requirement in NRAP9 for counsel to file a certified transcript.] Answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. 99-09880
11/19/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 11/18/99. 99-11555
12/21/1999BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 12/20/99. 99-12985
01/11/2000BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: 1/10/00. 00-00464
01/11/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
01/09/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. We have reviewed the record on appeal, and for the reasons stated in the attached order of the district court, conclude that appellant's contentions lack merit. " . . . we affirm the order of the district court denying appellant's post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus." SNP00A-1-CY/RR/NB 01-00420
02/06/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-00657
02/06/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
02/20/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on February 7, 2001. 01-00657