judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ACRI VS. DETROLIO

Case Information: 35932
Short Caption:ACRI VS. DETROLIOCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 33599 , 34792
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A385377Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:05/09/2000How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
04/11/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Mitchell Acri--check no. 3249.
04/11/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-05780
04/18/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 00-06185
05/09/2000Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 through 3. Mailed on 05/05/00. 00-07678
05/09/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
05/12/2000Other Other. Returned, unfiled, proper person documents (with letter).
05/26/2000MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Pharmacy Board Defendants' (Respondents') Motion to Dismiss. 00-08950
06/08/2000MotionReceived Proper Person Response. Appellant's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. 00-09690
07/21/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Association of Counsel. Substitution of Counsel. Louis Ling, General Counsel for the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy, in place of the Office of Attorney General. 00-12686
04/24/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Resolving Motion or Stipulation. Denying Motion to Partially Dismiss Appeal. On May 26, 2000, several respondents filed a motion to partially dismiss this appeal. fn1[The motion to dismiss was filed by Louis Ling, Keith Macdonald, John Q. Adams, Robert M. Grzywacz, George Harvey, Russell Javers, Larry L. Pinson, Sandra Schroeder, and Joe Kellogg (hereinafter 'respondents') We received a response from appellant Acri in opposition to the motion.] In this appeal, it appears that Acri has properly appealed from the district court's final judgment. He can challenge the district court's interlocutory orders, including the December 4, 1998 order, in the context of this appeal. We therefore deny the motion to dismiss. fn7[We direct the clerk of this court to file the proper person opposition received on June 8, 2000.] 02-07218
04/24/2002MotionFiled Proper Person Response. Appellant's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. 00-09690
02/18/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Appellant Mitchell Acri has submitted a motion that an addendum be admitted with respect to his application and petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have not received, however, such an application and petition in this court. Additionally, appellant Acri has paid the $200.00 filing fee in this appeal. Consequently, we deny his motion as moot. 03-02755
03/17/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file documents in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP03-MS/ML/NB 03-04389
04/11/2003RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 through 3 this day. 03-04607
04/11/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
04/28/2003RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 14, 2003. 03-04607