| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/21/2001 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | | |
| 08/21/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person Fast Track. (Fast track notice mailed to trial counsel.) | | 01-14134
|
| 09/05/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from counsel for appellant: 20 days from the date of this order. fn1[Appellant apparently signed the notice of appeal before the expiration of the appeal period. It therefore appears possible that the notice of appeal was delivered to prison officials within the 30 day period, and may therefore be timely.] | | 01-15002
|
| 09/27/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to September 5, 2001 Order. | | 01-16332
|
| 10/04/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Certificate of Service on Clark County District Attorney. | | 01-16708
|
| 10/15/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Prior to making a final determination of jurisdiction over this appeal, a copy of the entry in the log book of appellant's notice of appeal is required. Counsel for appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to supplement his response. | | 01-17297
|
| 11/05/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. October 15, 2001 Order. | | 01-18434
|
| 11/16/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On September 27, 2001, counsel for appellant submitted a response to this court's order, and on November 5, 2001, counsel for appellant supplemented his response with a copy of the prison log. Pursuant to Kellogg, this court concludes that it has jurisdiciton over this appeal. Counsel for appellant shall have 40 days from the date of this order to file and serve a fast track statement and appendix. Thereafter, this appeal shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of NRAP 3C. | | 01-19247
|
| 11/20/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion. | | 01-19459
|
| 12/11/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On November 20, 2001, counsel for appellant filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant. Counsel may not withdraw until he has fulfilled the obligations placed on trial counsel by NRAP 3C(b). Specifically, counsel must first file a rough draft transcript request form and a fast track statement. The motion to withdraw is therefore denied. Counsel for appellant shall file and serve the fast track statement within 40 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, this appeal shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of NRAP 3C. | | 01-20755
|
| 01/22/2002 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | | 02-01419
|
| 01/22/2002 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Fast Track Statement. | | 02-01420
|
| 01/28/2002 | Other | Other. Filed Verification and Certificate of Service for the Fast Track Statement and Appendix. | | 02-01832
|
| 02/13/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Excess Pages. | | 02-02832
|
| 02/15/2002 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed February 13, 2002. The clerk shall file the 15-page fast track response and appendix received on February 13, 2002. | | 02-03057
|
| 02/15/2002 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | | 02-02833
|
| 02/15/2002 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Fast Track Response. | | 02-02834
|
| 03/14/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." NNP02-MS/RR/NB | | 02-04600
|
| 04/25/2002 | Motion | Received Proper Person Motion. Motion for an Additional 7 Day Enlargement of Time, up to and including, April 22, 2002, to file Petition for Rehearing (Amended) and Supplemental Appendix (Exhibits). | | 02-07373
|
| 04/25/2002 | Motion | Received Proper Person Motion. Motion for Additional 7 Day Enlargement of time to file Petition for Rehearing (Amended) and Supplemental Arguments, Cites and Exhibits (NRAP 26b). | | 02-07374
|
| 05/07/2002 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40( c). fn1[We grant Marsee's motion for permission to file documents in proper person. The clerk shall file the documents received in this court on April 4, 2002, and April 25, 2001, including the proper person petition and amended petition for rehearing received on those dates. We deny Marsee's proper person motions for extensions of time to file additional documents.] NNP02-MS/RR/NB | | 02-07963
|
| 05/07/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Appellant's Motion for Leave to file Proper Person Briefs and Papers (NRAP 46(b)). | | 02-06043
|
| 05/07/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion for Enlargement of Time NRAP 26(b) for 7 Days to file Supplement Arguments and Cites to Motion for Rehearing. | | 02-06044
|
| 05/07/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion for an Additional 7 Day Enlargement of Time, up to and including, April 22, 2002, to file Petition for Rehearing (Amended) and Supplemental Appendix (Exhibits). | | 02-07373
|
| 05/07/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion for Additional 7 Day Enlargement of time to file Petition for Rehearing (Amended) and Supplemental Arguments, Cites and Exhibits (NRAP 26b). | | 02-07374
|
| 05/07/2002 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Proper Person Petition for Rehearing. | | 02-07375
|
| 05/07/2002 | Other Incoming Document | Filed Proper Person Document. Appellant's Appendix to Petition for Rehearing. | | 02-07376
|
| 05/22/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 02-07992
|
| 05/22/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 06/10/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On May 29, 2002, appellant submitted a proper person motion for permission to fax a petition for en banc reconsideration or alternatively an enlargement of time to file the petition. It appears appellant attempted to deliver the petition to prison officials for mailing on May 17, 2002, which would have been the last day for appellant to file a timely petition for en banc reconsideration. We deem the petition to have been timely submitted. The clerk shall file the petition and motion received on May 29, 2002. fn1[We note that the filing of a petition for en banc reconsideration does not affect the finality of a judgment and does not stay the issuance of the remittitur. We decline to recall the remittitur.] In light of this order, we deny as moot appellant's motion for permission to fax or an extension of time. | | 02-10003
|
| 06/10/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion for Permission to Fax Petition for En Banc Reconsideration or, Alternatively, Additional 3 Day Enlargement of Time to Mail Petition. | | 02-09359
|
| 06/10/2002 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Answer to Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. | | 02-09360
|
| 06/17/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 24, 2002. | | 02-07992
|
| 07/22/2002 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." EN BANC | | 02-12540
|
| 07/30/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On May 7, 2002, this court entered an order denying appellant's petition for rehearing. Accordingly, on May 22, 2002, the remittitur was issued. On June 10, 2002, this court entered an order allowing appellant to file a proper person petition for en banc reconsideration. fn1[The petition for en banc reconsideration was received on May 29, 2002, along with a motion for permission to file the petition.] On June 13, 2002, appellant submitted proper person document entitled, "Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Remittitur Pending Application to the United States Supreme Court for Writ of Certiorari Pursuant to NRAP 41(b) and Rules of the Supreme Court Rules 10 through 14." fn2[Because we elect to resolve the motion, we direct the clerk of this court to file the proper person documents received on June 13, 2002. We decline to grant appellant permission to file additional documents in proper person. NRAP 46(b).] On July 22, 2002, this court entered an order denying appellant's proper person petition for en banc reconsideration. The remittitur having issued in this appeal and this court having denied appellant's petition for en banc reconsideration, we deny appellant's motion for a stay of the remittitur. The denial of appellant's motion is without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion to recall the remittitur in the event appellant files a petition for a writ of certiorari and the United States Supreme Court grants the petition. | | 02-13044
|
| 07/30/2002 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Remittitur Pending Application to the United States Supreme Court for Writ of Certiorari Pursuant to NRAP 41(b) and Rules of the Supreme Court Rules 10 through 14. | | 02-10239
|