Case Information: 38543 | |||
Short Caption: | STATE VS. DISTRICT COURT (DUCHARM) | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0001404 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | 04/08/2002 at 1:30 PM | Oral Argument Location: | Carson City |
Submission Date: | 04/08/2002 | How Submitted: | After Oral Argument |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
09/28/2001 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
09/28/2001 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. | 01-16438 | |
10/16/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. | 01-17459 | |
11/13/2001 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. | 01-18907 | |
12/18/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Permission to File a Reply to the Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition. | 01-21346 | |
01/04/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. for Leave to file Reply filed December 18, 2001. We direct the clerk of this court to file the reply received on December 18, 2001. | 02-00250 | |
01/04/2002 | Petition/Writ | Filed Reply to Answer to Petition. Reply to the Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition. | 01-21347 | |
02/25/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on April 8, 2002, at 1:30 p.m. (NNP02-MS/RR/NB) | ||
03/26/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | ||
04/08/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Argued by: Charles Hilsabeck, Deputy Attorney General for Petitioners. Sharon L. McDonald for Real Parties in Interest. NNP02-MS/RR/NB. | ||
06/10/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Permission to File Supplemental Authorities. | 02-10042 | |
06/19/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On April 8, 2002, oral argument was held on this matter. On June 10, 2002, petitioners filed a motion for permission to file supplemental authorities. Petitioners wish to notify this court of a decision entered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on June 6, 2002. A copy of that decision is attached to the motion. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. This court shall take note of that decision in our review of this matter. | 02-10642 | |
10/16/2002 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Petition denied." Before Shearing, Rose and Becker, JJ. Per Curiam. 118 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 64. NNP02 | 02-17936 | |
11/05/2002 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: November 4, 2002. | 02-19072 | |
12/04/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Change of Address. Law Firm of Sharon McDonald. | 02-20730 | |
01/30/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 40(c). NNP02-MS/RR/NB | 03-01681 | |
02/25/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 03-03109 | |
02/25/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. |