| Case Information: 36612 | |||
| Short Caption: | ATM INTERNATIONAL VS. ELECTRONIC PROCESSING | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A380601 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Leavitt | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 09/07/2000 / Dentico, Michael | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/22/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Berkley, Gordon, Levine, Goldstein & Garfinkel, LLP--check no. 3933. | ||
| 08/22/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. | 00-14678 | |
| 08/22/2000 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Leavitt. Sat in district court proceedings. | ||
| 09/06/2000 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Michael V. Dentico. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 12/29/2000 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: January 12, 2001. | 00-22694 | |
| 03/09/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | 01-04323 | |
| 03/09/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days | ||
| 03/21/2001 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | 01-04955 | |
| 03/27/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. (Not signed by Nevada counsel, inadequate number of copies, no original). Docketing Statement mailed to Berkley, Gordon, Levine, Goldstein & Garfinkel law firm (Nevada counsel for appellant). Due date: 10 days. | ||
| 04/06/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 01-05946 | |
| 04/06/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 6/12/00 and 6/27/00. To Court Reporter: Janice Liston. | 01-05947 | |
| 05/07/2001 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: June 27, 2000. Court Reporter: Karen Snyder. | 01-07563 | |
| 07/27/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from appellant: 20 days from the date of this order. In the event the district court enters a written order formally resolving the claims and cross-claims, appellant may cure the jurisdictional defect by filing an amended notice of appeal. The briefing schedule is suspended pending further order of this court. | 01-12721 | |
| 08/17/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 01-14025 | |
| 09/04/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | 01-14871 | |
| 09/04/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. (Supplemental). | 01-14932 | |
| 11/13/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. fn1[In ATM'S August 17, 2001 response, it requested additional time to file a supplemental response. In light of the supplemental response being filed on September 4, 2001, we deny ATM's request as moot.] ATM shall have 20 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for alck of jurisdiciton. In the event the district court made a clerical error, we grant leave to correct the clerical error pursuant to NRCP 60(a). If the district court enters a new order, ATM must file an amended notice of appeal pursuant to NRAP 4(a). The briefing schedule remains suspended pending further order of this court. | 01-18828 | |
| 04/10/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. ATM has not responded to our November 13, 2001 order. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." NNP02-MS/RR/NB | 02-06329 | |
| 05/07/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-06532 | |
| 05/07/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 05/20/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 14, 2002. | 02-06532 | |