Case Information: 41656 | |||
Short Caption: | IKEUCHI (HALINA) VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C189413 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Criminal - Certiorari/Prohibition |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
06/30/2003 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
06/30/2003 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, Mandamus. | 03-10881 | |
07/01/2003 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit. Due Date: 10 days | ||
07/07/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 15 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. | 03-11250 | |
07/08/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Affidavit. Affidavit and Verification in Support of Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, Mandamus. | 03-11448 | |
07/11/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. (Affidavit). | 03-11668 | |
09/09/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. On July 7, 2003, this court entered an order directing the State, on behalf of the respondent, to file an answer to the petition on or before July 22, 2003. To date, the State has not complied with that order. The State shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer to the petition or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on counsel for the State. | 03-15108 | |
09/24/2003 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. | 03-15985 | |
11/06/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Granting Petition. In light of the State's response, " . . . we grant this petition in part." The clerk of this court shall issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to reconsider its order directing the forced medication of petitioner and reevaluate the request to forcible medicate petitioner in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Sell, as well as its related decisions in Riggins v. Nevada 504 U.S. 127 (1992) and Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). NNP04S-NB/MS/MG | 03-18505 | |
11/06/2003 | Writ | Issued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Thomas W. Rigsby for service upon Judge John S. McGroarty. | 03-18553 | |
12/02/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 03-18599 | |
12/02/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
03/19/2004 | Writ | Filed Writ. Served on Judge John S. McGroarty on March 15th, 2004. | 03-18553 |