Docket Entries |
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
08/16/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Dickerson, Dickerson, Consul & Pocker--check no. 6781. | | |
08/16/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 01-13946 |
08/23/2001 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Lansford W. Levitt. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
09/04/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. Appellant/Cross-Respondent. | | 01-14921 |
09/04/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Ecker & Standish, Chartered--check no. 34718. | | |
09/04/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for cross-appellant.) | | 01-14925 |
09/04/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice. Parties are advised to notify this court immediately if a change of designation of parties is desired. | | |
09/06/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Lansford W. Levitt. | | |
09/12/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Lansford W. Levitt. | | |
09/21/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. Respondent/Cross-Appellant. | | 01-15944 |
09/24/2001 | Other | Other. Mailed additional documents to Settlement Judge Lansford W. Levitt. | | |
11/09/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 01-18752 |
11/21/2001 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. This court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal and cross-appeal. Appellant/cross-respondent and respondent/cross-appellant shall each have 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a). Because this is a child custody matter, appellant/cross-respondent shall have 90 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix on appeal. Respondent/cross-appellant shall have 20 days thereafter to file and serve a combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal. Appellant/cross-respondent shall have 10 days thereafter to file and serve a combined reply brief on appeal and answering brief on cross-appeal. Respondent/cross-appellant shall have 10 days thereafter to file and serve a reply brief on cross-appeal. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(2); NRAP 28(h) and (c). | | 01-19606 |
12/07/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. (Respondent/Cross-Appellant). | | 01-20598 |
12/10/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 9/13/00; 9/15/00; 12/21/00; 2/2/01; 2/7/01; and 7/10/01. To Court Reporter: Family Court Transcript Services. | | 01-20642 |
12/13/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion to Remand. | | 01-20991 |
12/31/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Deena Cooperman's Opposition to Steven Leibowitz' Motion to Remand. | | 01-21871 |
01/14/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | | 02-00971 |
02/15/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant Deena Cooperman's Opening Brief (First Request). | | 02-03026 |
03/01/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On January 14, 2002, Transcript/Video Services filed a motion requesting an extension of time to March 9, 2002 to file and serve the requested transcripts. We grant the motion. Because March 9, 2002, is not a court business day, however, Transcript/Video Services shall prepare and file the requested transcripts by March 11, 2002. On February 15, 2002, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. Accordingly, appellant shall file and serve the opening brief and appendix by April 22, 2002. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(2). | | 02-03771 |
03/11/2002 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: 9/13/00; 09/15/00; 12/21/00; 02/02/01; 02/07/01; and 07/10/01. Court Reporter: Shelly A. Ajoub. | | 02-04361 |
04/22/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Suspension of Briefing Schedule; or in the alternative Motion for an Extension of time to file Appellant Deena Cooperman's Opening Brief. | | 02-07028 |
04/30/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Response to Appellant's Motion for Suspension of Briefing Schedule. | | 02-07626 |
05/06/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. --transcripts were mailed to counsel for respondent on April 24, 2002. | | 02-07882 |
05/16/2002 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Robert Eisenberg regarding Motion to Remand filed December 13, 2001. | | 02-08654 |
05/20/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Supplemental Response to Appellant's Motion for Suspension of Briefing Schedule. | | 02-08899 |
06/21/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On April 22, 2002, appellant/cross-respondent (appellant) filed a motion requesting a suspension of the briefing schedule to provide appellant an opportunity to obtain new counsel to represent her in this appeal. On April 30, 2002, respondent/cross-appellant (respondent) filed an opposition to appellant's motion. On May 20, 2002, respondent filed a supplement to his opposition and indicates that 'the district court ruled on the disqualification, and the district court determined that appellant's counsel is not disqualified.' We deny appellant's motion to suspend the briefing schedule. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Respondent shall have 20 days from service of the opening brief to file a combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal. Appellant shall have 10 days from service of respondent's combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal to file a combined answering brief on cross-appeal and reply brief on appeal. Respondent shall have 10 days from service of appellant's combined answering brief on cross-appeal and reply brief on appeal to file and serve a reply brief on cross-appeal, if any. NRAP 28(c) and NRAP 31(a)(2). | | 02-10749 |
08/13/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, appellant/cross-respondent (appellant) has failed to file the opening brief and appendix. Appellant shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file the required documents or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Respondent/cross-appellant (respondent) shall have 20 days from service of the opening brief to file a combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal. Appellant shall have 10 days from service or respondent's combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal to file a combined answering brief on cross-appeal and reply brief on appeal. Respondent shall have 10 days from service of appellant's combined answering brief on cross-appeal and reply brief on appeal to file and serve a reply brief on cross-appeal, if deemed necessary. NRAP 31(a)(2). | | 02-13815 |
08/30/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Motion to Dismiss Appeal, for Failure to Comply with Supreme Court Order; Notice of Dismissal of Cross-Appeal; Request for Expedited Consideration. | | 02-15107 |
09/16/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Response to Motion to Dismiss Apeal for Failure to Comply with Supreme Court Orders; Notice of Dismissal of Cross-Appeal; Request for Expedited Consideration; and Belated Response to this Court's Orders. | | 02-16055 |
11/08/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Because it appears that the parties may have settled this appeal and cross-appeal, we deny respondent's motion to dismiss. The parties shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal and cross-appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of their appeals. Failure to comply timely with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal and cross-appeal as abandoned. fn1[We defer ruling on respondent's December 13, 2001, motion to remand pending further order of this court.] | | 02-19298 |
12/02/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Respondent/Cross-Appellant's Response to Order of November 8, 2002. | | 02-20557 |
01/08/2003 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Robert L. Eisenberg regarding the status of this case. | | 03-00409 |
03/04/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Second Motion to Dismiss Appeal, Based Upon Appellant's Failure to Comply with Multiple Supreme Court Orders. | | 03-03582 |
04/02/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Submission of Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. | | 03-05561 |
04/17/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. And Order to Show Cause. We grant respondent's motions and ' . . . dismiss appellant's appeal and also dismiss respondent's cross-appeal.' fn1[We deny, as moot, respondent's April 2, 2003, request for submission of his March 4, 2003, motion.] Because it appears that appellant may have taken this appeal solely for the purpose of delay, appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to show cause why this court should not award respondent attorney fees pursuant to NRAP 38(b). fn2[We deny, as moot, respondent's December 13, 2001, motion to remand.] NNP03-RR/WM/MG | | 03-06532 |
05/12/2003 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-08032 |
05/13/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 03-06759 |
05/13/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
05/19/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 16, 2003. | | 03-06759 |
05/23/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Permission to File Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-08800 |
12/19/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On April 17, 2003, this court entered an order dismissing this appeal and cross-appeal and directing appellant/cross-respondent ('appellant') to show cause why this court should not award respondent/cross-appellant ('respondent') attorney fees pursuant to NRAP 38. Appellant has filed a response to the April 17, 2003, order. Respondent has filed a motion requesting leave to file a reply to appellant's response. Cause appearing, we grant the motion to file a reply. The clerk shall file the reply received on May 23, 2003. Having reviewed the response and reply, we conclude that the imposition of sanctions pursuant to NRAP 38 is not warranted. | | 03-21167 |
12/19/2003 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-08801 |